commander of U.S. Central Command. The new agency absorbed some other commands, including Joint Task Force — Global Network Operations and Joint Functional Component Com- mand — Network Warfare; their staffs relocated to Fort Meade. The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) headquarters also moved to the base. In April 2014, Adm. Michael S. Rogers, USN, succeeded Alexander as head of both CYBERCOM and the NSA.
A work in progress As one of DoD’s newest commands, CYBERCOM is still in the process of implementing its Cyber Mission Force (CMF) planning model, which will be built over the next few years, ac- cording to a command spokesperson. There are three types of teams that will comprise the CMF to work three main mission areas: Defend the na- tion, when directed by the president (Cyber National Mission Force); sup- port combatant commanders’ priori- ties (Cyber Combat Mission Force);
(clockwise from above) Personnel of the 624th Operations Center conduct operations in support of Air Forces Cyber. A program manager uses a touch table designed by Plan X, a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency cyber warfare program. Adm. Michael Rogers, USN, right, accepts the Cyber Command flag from Adm. Cecil Haney, USN, as Rogers assumes command.
and defend the DoD information networks (Cyber Protection Teams). While each force has a specific mis- sion area (defend the nation to pro- tect critical infrastructure; support combatant commanders; defend the DoDIN), integrated planning and co- ordination goes through the CYBER- COM headquarters to identify mission gaps while helping to avoid unneces- sary duplication of effort. The agency has its work cut out for
it, as Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Congress in 2013. Speaking to the House Armed Ser- vices Committee, Clapper noted the threat of cyberattacks by foreign na- tions could be an even greater danger than that posed by global terrorism. It’s not only military networks at risk, said Clapper, but also the nation’s crit- ical water, energy, financial, and infor- mation infrastructure. Such an attack, he said, could cripple our economy in much the same way 9/11 did. It’s hard to imagine a single hacker or team of programmers could wreak that kind of havoc, but it is becom- ing more likely. In 2007, the Idaho National Laboratory conducted a test to point out weaknesses in America’s electrical grid by changing the operat- ing cycle of a power generator remote-
JANUARY 2014 MILITARY OFFICER 65
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96