washingtonscene
war, and treating military people fairly are not mutually exclusive. Addressing our nation’s debt is a
priority, and all Americans must be prepared to share the sacrifices re- quired to accomplish it. But a nation still at war must meet funding needs for both people and weapons, rather than sacrificing one for the other. The arbitrary cuts of sequestration
will force service planners to impose even steeper force-reduction efforts in the midst of ongoing military opera- tions around the world. This threat- ens the nation’s ability to respond to future threats and places the burden of these operations squarely on the shoulders of the remaining troops and families. Therefore, finding relief from sequestration for DoD will be a top goal this year. To the extent force cuts require
separation of members with lengthy service, MOAA supports the use of the early retirement authority and enhanced voluntary separation incen- tives to more fairly recognize these service- members’ extended service and sacrifice.
Health Care Issues
Bar disproportional TRICARE fee hikes MOAA insists 1) a unique military health plan is an essential offset to the arduous conditions entailed in a military career; 2) any fee-adjustment formula must recognize that military beneficiaries prepay very large premiums for their lifetime coverage through decades of service and sacrifice; and 3) the country must have a higher obligation to them than corporate employers demonstrate for their active and retired employees. To that end, any percentage increase in military beneficiaries’ health care fees in any year
PHOTO: STEVE BARRETT
Fighting for MOAA's interests are, from left, Col. Catherine Mozden Lewis, USA (Ret); Jamie Naughton; Matt Murphy; Capt. Kathy Beasley, USN (Ret); Col. Bob Norton, USA (Ret); MOAA President Vice Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr., USN (Ret); Col. Mike Hayden, USAF (Ret); Col. Mike Barron, USA (Ret); Col. Phil Odom, USAF (Ret); and Karen Golden.
should not exceed the percentage increase in their military compensation. MOAA adamantly will resist propos- als to make military health care programs more like those offered by civilian employ- ers, such as proposals to dramatically in- crease pharmacy copayments, bar retirees from participation in TRICARE Prime, and/or add thousands of dollars a year to military beneficiaries’ costs.
Reverse Medicare/TRICARE payment cuts Medicare and TRICARE (whose payment levels are tied to Medicare’s by law) already pay health care providers less than most commercial insurance, and further payment cuts will deter providers from accepting military beneficiaries. Under current law, Medicare and TRICARE payments will be reduced nearly 22
JANUARY 2015 MILITARY OFFICER 43
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96