Finance Focus
industries may be negatively perceived by other jurisdictions. Of particular concern is how such incentives may be viewed within the context of the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project undertaken by OECD.
While it is commendable that the Hong Kong government is mindful of the progress of the BEPS project, the project should not of itself be a reason to disregard the use of tax incentives. The focus of the OECD is not to preclude jurisdictions from providing tax incentives, but rather to develop more effective solutions to harmful tax practices, priorities being improving transparency and requiring substantial activity in support of preferential regimes. As such, provided that Hong Kong addresses the necessary concerns of the OECD, any tax incentives introduced should not be perceived negatively.
Q
What can you tell us about the new stand-alone tax information exchange agreements (TIEA) in Hong Kong?
The law that was passed in July last year allows the Hong Kong government to enter into an agreement with the government of a territory outside Hong Kong for exchanging of information in relation to any tax imposed by the laws of Hong Kong or the territory (i.e. a TIEA). Previously Hong Kong could only exchange information with its tax treaty partners. Now Hong Kong can sign TIEA’s with countries that you would not otherwise sign a tax treaty (i.e. tax haven countries like the Cayman Islands, BVI, and Bermuda). The only purpose of a TIEA is to
exchange information in respect of taxpayers for the prevention of tax evasion.
The passage of the new law will enable Hong Kong to comply with the latest international standard on tax transparency and maintain its reputation as an international business and financial centre. In particular, the new law helped Hong Kong to pass the Phase 2 peer review conducted by the Global Forum in November last year. Having passed the Phase 2 peer review, Hong Kong is considered to have in place an adequate legal and regulatory framework to facilitate effective exchange of information.
The relaxation of the restrictions on information that can be exchanged under the treaty framework may also help Hong Kong persuade certain key jurisdictions to commence negotiations with Hong Kong toward a treaty, thus further expanding Hong Kong’s treaty network.
Q
How do TIEAs impact doing business in Hong Kong?
These measures reflect the increasing trend in international tax towards global transparency and greater sharing of information. While this trend may lead to increased costs of doing business, it is important to understand that a TIEA cannot simply be used by another country to obtain any information they desire in so called ‘fishing expeditions’. Under a TIEA, information will only be exchanged upon request. Hong Kong has not yet agreed to exchange information on an automatic or spontaneous basis. Information, including bank information, will only be supplied upon specific and bona-fide requests received
from the competent authority of an agreement partner.
Q
How has Hong Kong furthered its exchange of information practices?
Whilst Hong Kong has yet to sign a stand- alone TIEA, it is understood that Hong Kong is currently negotiating with the United States and certain Nordic European countries with a view to concluding a TIEA. Given Hong Kong’s preference for negotiations through tax treaties, the government is actively seeking to update its old tax treaties to incorporate the latest version of the OECD exchange of information article. In January this year, HK signed a second protocol to the Vietnam treaty for this very purpose.
Q
What are your recommendations for ensuring continued tax compliance
and efficiency for those operating in Hong Kong?
Given the rapid pace that the OECD and G20 are moving forward with their work on the BEPS project, companies should be reviewing their operating models and legal structures to ensure that they are supportable from a tax perspective. As greater information about taxpayers is shared between countries, there will be increasing competition for a share of the global tax pie. Evaluating your supply chain to determine where value is created and how different assets, functions and risks should be deployed and located will become even more critical in managing the tax costs and tax risk.
55
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90