Special Feature
check that your disk was made from the rare limestone from Palau. Once you (or rather, your computer) have found one of these numbers then it is yours and you can keep it or trade it.
As in the case of the stones, if I send you my Bitcoin, the coin isn’t really going anywhere (after all, all I’m doing is sending you a copy of the numbers that I found) and what we are really doing is just telling everybody else that the coin now belongs to you and not to me. On Yap, the record of ownership of the stones was part of the collective cultural memory, but in Bitcoin it is the distributed transaction ledger known as the ‘blockchain’.
In essence, when I give you a Bitcoin the record of that transaction is copied out to all of the other users so that everyone now knows that the coin belongs to you. Because of the particular mathematical properties of the numbers used in the Bitcoin system there is a finite supply (21 million) of these numbers and once they are all discovered no more can ever be ‘minted’. It would be as if Palau had been eroded away by the Pacific storms so that no more limestone disks could enter the Yap economy.
There is one conceptual difference between Bitcoins and stone disks that is much remarked on in media reports. When it came to the stones, everyone knew who they belonged to.
20
www.finance-monthly.com
They knew that Stone X belonged to Tribesman A and everyone knew who Tribesman A was. But in Bitcoin, the coins are associated with cryptographic keys rather than individuals. You might know which internet address one of those cryptographic keys is associated with during a transaction, but that doesn’t tell you who the person is. So there is a kind of not- quite-anonymity associated with Bitcoin that would have been impossible to imagine for the Yap islanders.
With Bitcoin, the ‘mining’, which doesn’t involve limestone blocks, is actually the work that goes into maintaining the blockchain. And it is this blockchain that I think is a lot more interesting than the Bitcoin currency that has been in the news.
The blockchain is the mechanism for
maintaining an open and distributed ledger that has its integrity protected through the use of cryptographic ‘proof of work’. It is a digital asset transmission network, and electronic cash is only one of the kinds of digital asset that might be transferred and quite possibly not the most interesting one (if you can transfer digital assets efficiently then you have no need to use cash as an intermediary).
Nonetheless, some people are using it for electronic cash, and having handed over that cash to people they had never met before and
had no reason to trust, they are predictably, if not reasonably, upset that it can sometimes be stolen. The recent Mt Gox attack, for example, saw XBT 850,000 (worth around $468 million) disappear.
However, while that’s very sad for them, I still don’t see it as a major issue in the evolution of the Bitcoin technology. And for that reason, I doubt very much that traditional financial sector players, who understand the technology, are that bothered about the apparent losses (I say apparent, because as yet no-one knows where the Bitcoins have gone because no-one knows who the wallets belong to).
If you’re with me so far, then I think we’ve agreed that we should be looking beyond Bitcoins as they are now. But for what?
For one thing, it seems to me that there are plenty of business opportunities for the existing players to use the technology in interesting ways.
In their research note “Is bitcoin a currency? No.” the Goldman Sachs analysts Dominic Wilson and Jose Ursua concluded that Bitcoin has “a much better shot at influencing payments technology than taking off as a currency”. They are surely correct. Take remittances. MasterCard might, for example, want to look at using something bitcoin-like as a backbone for HomeSend, the new remittance business
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90