This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
The Interview


How has the investment landscape for energy infrastructure developed in recent years?


The energy markets are in a period of transition as regulations change, such as the renewable portfolio standards and environmental standards, and new technologies emerge.


I previously mentioned the


shift from coal to natural gas, which is primarily the result of market forces including the exploitation of shale gas, but also the implementation of new environmental regulation. Likewise, the growth in renewable energy power projects has been driven by a combination of the drop in the cost of renewable energy, technological improvements resulting in higher capacity factors and the implementation of renewable energy portfolio standards and federal tax law. We apply deep industry experience to capitalize on market disruption and opportunities generated by these changes. Starwood Energy’s approach to underwriting an investment includes a consideration of the project risk profile and conformity to our investment philosophy.


The market environment changes frequently, so we must stay current and flexible regarding the changing investment opportunities. For example, in 2009-2010 we found utility-scale solar to be very interesting, but now competition for these opportunities has resulted in greater market efficiency and lower returns. More recently, we have found wind power projects to be an attractive investment because a large number of projects were developed upon the change of tax law in mid-2012, and European investors are rebalancing their portfolios. We typically collaborate with highly experienced developers on greenfield projects, despite having those capabilities in-house.


This frees up


our team’s resources to better focus on our overall portfolio.


You recently closed your second energy infrastructure fund; what more can you tell us about this?


SEIF II closed in December 2013 with total capital


commitments of $983 million, above its target of $750 million and at our hard cap. Many of our first fund investors recommitted to the second fund based on our track record. We broadened our investor base with commitments from pension plans and sovereign wealth funds in Asia, the Middle East and Australia. We also found robust interest from European and American insurance companies, including those experts in energy infrastructure investing.


What are your plans for this fund?


Our approach to the market has been yielding excellent results, so we intend to continue what we are doing and focus on value-add opportunities in power generation and transmission, with the ultimate goal of creating well-structured investments with contracted cash flow and predictable yield. While we do not have allocation targets, approximately 40% of our first fund was invested in renewable energy generation, 35% in natural gas fired generation and the remaining 25% in power transmission projects. Based on our current pipeline, we do not predict a significant change with the new fund, but market opportunity will ultimately determine where we end up.


What is in store for Starwood Energy in the near future?


Both the short-term and long-term fundamentals of the North American energy markets offer compelling opportunities for investment. The continued growth in


opportunities to secure long-term revenue contracts that support well-structured investments with recurring dividends. One way of describing what we do is we create energy infrastructure projects well- suited to the investment objectives of ‘core’ investors including pension plans, insurance companies, and public yield-oriented investment vehicles.


Is there anything else you would like to add? Starwood Energy works


with investment-grade


engineering, procurement and construction contractors that provide liquidated damages for delays or performance shortfalls. This provides a safeguard for investors on the off-chance things do not go according to plan during construction. Starwood Energy has never, to date, had any adverse effect on its economics from construction. The projects have been on time and either on budget or under budget.


We have a highly experienced team with the unique expertise required to successfully navigate the regulatory, technological and economic complexities of the power generation and transmission market. This allows us to fulfill our goal of being flexible in moving back and forth between opportunities, depending on which are offering the most interesting risk-adjusted premiums. Through discipline and care, we have proven the availability to capture very attractive risk-adjusted returns for our investors.


electricity demand, coupled with increasingly stringent environmental regulations, the retirement of conventional coal-fired generation capacity, and demand for additional power generation facilities and high-voltage transmission capacity provide significant investment opportunities in the sector. We expect to keep a close watch over the technological feasibility of shifting power delivery from the centralized model we have built over the last century to a more distributed model. But, in the end, we will be focusing on


Having invested across a variety of energy subsectors since launching almost a decade ago, Starwood Energy has shown a remarkable ability to adapt its strategy to benefit from a growing and changing market.


Contact: www.starwoodenergygroup.com


43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90