This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
-0.35 -0.30 -0.25 -0.20 -0.15 -0.10


-0.6 -0.4 Figure 26, Through plane error, magnitude 7. DISCUSSION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS


7.1 THROUGH PLANE VELOCITY COMPONENTS


Table 13 shows a summary of the non-dimensional errors in the through plane velocity components for each of the locations around the tug. In this table, the non- dimensional parameter Erroru (which is the error in the through-plane velocity component) was calculated from Tables 7 to 12 by non-dimensionalizing the values of ErrorVx with the free stream flow speed.


Table 13, Non-dimensional values of Erroru Flow region


Tetrahedral mesh


Upstream, no fin -0.133


Down stream, no fin -0.068 Downstream, with fin -0.124


7.2 IN-PLANE VELOCITY COMPONENTS


Three numerical values were picked to compare the PIV experiments with the tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes. These were the mean value and standard deviation of Error2D and the fraction of the data where the error between the CFD predictions and the experiments (for the in-plane flow components) were within 10% of the free stream speed. The values were non-dimensionalized based on the free stream speed of 0.5 m/s. The results are given in Tables 14 to 16.


Table 14, Non-dimensional mean, Error2D


Hexahedral mesh


-0.138 -0.080 -0.175


From these values it can be seen that the value of Erroru is consistently negative. This means that the flow component from the CFD predictions was consistently higher than the observed values in the experiments. The difference was consistent with the values of the wake from the seeding rake used for these


experiments


(Molyneux et al., 2007a), which was seen to be between 10 and 12 percent of the free stream flow. It was expected that


the wake from the seeding rake was


reducing the flow speed, relative to the case when the rake was not present. It was also shown that the rake had negligible effect on the in-plane flow measurements, so comparison between the CFD simulations and the PIV experiments should be focussed on the in-plane flow patterns.


Upstream, no fin


Flow region Tetrahedral mesh 0.083


Down stream, no fin


Downstream, with fin


0.074 0.097


Hexahedral mesh 0.076


0.078 0.101 Table 15, Non-dimensional standard deviation, Error2D


Upstream, no fin


Flow region Tetrahedral mesh 0.117


Down stream, no fin


Downstream, with fin


0.049 0.064


Hexahedral mesh 0.107


0.055 0.074 -0.2 y, m 0.0 0.2


0.2 0.1 0.0


-0.1 -0.2


©2008: Royal Institution of Naval Architects


B-57


Error Vx


z, m


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68