SOCIAL MEDIA
What about Vine’s chances of success if it were to dispute a DMCA order?
Generally, most companies are obliged to follow DMCA procedures, says Esquenet. But, she says, if Vine were to resist a DMCA takedown notice, which falls under US law, the fair use doctrine would be one defence to consider using.
“You would look at the nature of use, whether it’s transformative and if the new work is sending a different message from the original. Ten you consider the nature of the original work and whether it is factual, for example an account of a news story, or creative. Lastly, you would consider the portion used and the economic impact on the original.”
Another aspect to factor in when considering taking action on Vine, at least for US rights owners, is a doctrine known as fleeting use, says Bruce Ewing, partner at Dorsey & Whitney LLP in New York.
Te law, Ewing says, allows someone accused of copyright infringement to claim that the use is so brief that it could not have had any detrimental impact on a rights holder.
“Tere was an example (Hofeinz v A&E Television Networks) a number of years ago when A&E, a US cable TV network, aired a series called Biography,” says Ewing.
“During a programme dedicated to the actor Peter Graves, it included very short clips of his movies. Te owner of copyright sued, claiming that its rights had been infringed by the use of clips, but the court was convinced that the use was so brief that it was permissible under the Copyright Act.”
Ewing says that rights holders should consider the PR fallout of taking legal action.
“Tere is a strong and growing sentiment that rights holders in all spheres can be too aggressive when protecting their rights. More and more people are attuned to this, including rights holders. Te thought is that they should save their efforts for problems such as blatant infringement.”
Winckworth adds there are questions surrounding who to target—the service itself or the person who uploaded the video at issue.
“If you target the individuals, then the PR implications 20 Trademarks & Brands Online
“WITH THE CLIPS BEING SO SHORT, PEOPLE MAY FEEL THEIR RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED BUT ARE TAKING A ‘WAIT AND SEE’ APPROACH BEFORE REACTING WITH A LAWSUIT.”
are not the only thing you need to consider. Most content operators would say they are prepared to comply with a court order, but would not just give out a name on request.
“In the UK, this order typically follows an application for a ‘Norwich Pharmacal’ order—an order that a third party discloses information—and even though the application is unlikely to be contested and the path is well-trodden, the costs involved make this a large sledgehammer to crack what might be only a small nut.”
Football shots
One account that hasn’t yet been disputed is Football Vines, which posts clips of goals and controversial issues from the English Premier League and other leagues moments aſter they are broadcast.
At the time of writing the associated Twitter account of Football Vines had more than 300,000 followers.
“Football is an interesting area, mainly due to the fact that so much money is at stake in terms of television rights,” says Winckworth.
“However, if a rights holder were to take action against Football Vines, there is always the risk of its being counterproductive. It might draw attention to the Vine accounts and make people aware that clips might be accessible straight away without having to pay for a subscription.
“All these factors will form part of the analysis of whoever is considering bringing action. What is it worth, what is the harm and what are the PR implications?”
Volume 3, Issue 1
Other concerns
Although copyright is arguably the most common cause for concern on Vine, there are also potential problems surrounding privacy rights, says Ewing, particularly if brands market their products on Vine.
“Most states have a right to privacy laws, which apply to everybody. If your name, image or likeness is used in commercial advertising or promotion without written consent, you have a claim.”
However, Ewing adds that the use would have to be substantial for a claim to stand up in court.
Ewing highlights trademarks as also being potentially at risk on Vine. “Any time someone else’s trademark is shown in a clip there is the possibility of a claim,” he explains.
“Because of the length and fleeting nature of an image, the chances of a successful infringement or passing off claim are remote. However, six seconds could be long enough if a video clearly shows a recognised trademark being abused or obviously painted in a bad light,” he says, adding that a trademark dilution claim could easily stand up in court.
Any video created through Vine would likely be seen beyond its 50 million users, adds Esquenet.
“We already have seen, and will see, a lot of cross- promotion,” she says, adding that Vine videos are regularly shared across Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, with in excess of one billion users between the three.
“Te more you edit something, the better it becomes; if you can make a compelling argument in six seconds you will get users’ attention in a way that rises above the competition and methods used on other sites,” Esquenet says.
It is important to remember that Vine is relatively young in social media terms, but the associated IP concerns are clear for all to see. And with its prominence across YouTube, Facebook and Twitter likely to increase, its 50 million users are only the tip of the iceberg. It’s just a question of when, and in what capacity, more disputes will ignite.
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44