NEWS
“We fully expect the city to make another run at closing Santa Monica Airport,” says Baker. “We will use absolutely every resource available to us to prevent that from happening.” The city of Santa Monica has
repeatedly attempted to restrict operations or close the popular airport, which serves as an important reliever for nearby Los Angeles International Airport. On February 10, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) filed a friend of the court brief in support of the FAA’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Over the years, AOPA has spent
hundreds of hours engaging the pilot community, talking to community leaders, working with the FAA and participating in legal actions in support of the airfield.
NBAA LAUDS LATEST COURT DECISION PRESERVING ACCESS TO SANTA MONICA AIRPORT
The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) has also praised the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California halting the most recent effort by the city of Santa Monica, CA, to close down a vital local airfield for general aviation.
The city has repeatedly attempted
to restrict operations at SMO, with each prior case determined in favor of the federal government. The judge’s decision in this case rebuffs the city’s latest effort to find a means to close the airport, but does not definitively resolve the status of the airport. As a result, NBAA will continue to advocate for the airport’s future. “While we cheer this latest victory
in preserving a valuable Southern California airfield, we know that we must remain vigilant and focused in our work to preserve access to this airport, and all airfields in our nation’s aviation system,” NBAA president and CEO Ed Bolen says. In a lawsuit filed last October, city officials asserted that Santa Monica never relinquished ownership to the airport when it leased the property to the United States government for use
as a military airfield and manufacturing base ahead of World War II – effectively voiding any subsequent agreements with the FAA requiring the city to maintain the airfield. The FAA countered that the city’s latest claim was invalid under the Quiet Title Act, which establishes a 12-year deadline for any property disputes brought against the federal government, once the government establishes an interest in the property. That deadline passed more than 50 years ago, according to the agency – a position with which the court agreed. The court also rejected constitutional claims asserted by the city, holding that a claim for “takings” damages could only be heard in a specialized tribunal, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, DC. The court further held that the city’s claims of violations of due process and its sovereignty were premature, because the city had not tried to close the airport, and therefore, the FAA had not been called upon to enforce the requirement that the airport remain open. Shortly before the court ruled in
favor of the agency’s position, NBAA joined with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) in filing a brief of amicus curiae, or friend-of- the-court brief, supporting the FAA’s position against the city’s attempts to close SMO. “NBAA has worked for decades to
preserve access to airports, and we will continue to do so at Santa Monica and elsewhere,” Bolen saus. “We will remain actively engaged with our Members at SMO, and with national and local government officials, to ensure they hear the business aviation community’s united voice in calling to maintain access to this, and other essential GA airfields.”
AVFAB RECEIVES MEXICAN APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF AFT JUMP SEAT KIT IN ALL KING AIR SERIES AIRCRAFT
Aviation Fabricators (AvFab) announces it has received Mexican approval for the installation of its STC approved King Air Aft Jump Seat Kits on all Beechcraft King Air models.
03 2014 43
DOMmagazine.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64