This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Medicare to open physician payment data; organized medicine wary


Physicians’ and patients’ privacy rights and health care quality are at stake if the federal government poorly implements a new policy allowing for public disclo- sure of Medicare physician payment data. That was the warning the Texas Medical Association, the American Medical Asso- ciation, and roughly 100 other state and national medical specialty societies sent to Medicare officials as they developed the new rule, set to take effect March 18. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid


Services (CMS) announced in January that it will evaluate freedom-of-infor- mation requests for individual physician


payment information on a case-by-case basis. The new rule has been in the works since May 2013, when a U.S. dis- trict court judge in Florida dissolved a 1979 injunction that barred Medicare from releasing physician payment data on the grounds that doctors’ privacy rights outweighed the public interest. Offering no details, CMS says it will


“weigh the balance between the privacy interest of individual physicians and the public interest in disclosure of such in- formation.” The agency itself also plans to compile and make publicly available aggregate data on Medicare physician services, CMS Principal Deputy Admin- istrator Jonathan Blum said in a Jan. 14 blog post.


The new decision “takes into account [the Department of Health and Human Services’] strong commitment to greater data transparency over the past several years. … As part of this effort, CMS has engaged with a wide range of public,


nonprofit, and private sector stakehold- ers to foster the availability and use of health care data to drive innovations that improve health and health care,” Mr. Blum said. Organized medicine cautioned, how- ever, that CMS must walk a fine line.


“We believe these efforts to release Medi- care physician data are appropriate, rec- ognizing that they serve to enhance the quality of our health care system and in- clude safeguards. The unfettered release of raw data, however, could easily result in inaccurate and misleading informa- tion that could ultimately undermine the quality of care for patients,” the physician groups wrote in a comment letter. “Publication of reimbursement information for any purpose and with- out appropriate safeguards would move toward an opposite extreme — it would categorically dismiss significant privacy interests and would fail to ensure that the data can be used in a truly effective manner. Such broad, indiscriminate dis- closure of personal financial information would undermine the careful balance that presently exists in existing laws and regulations that recognize the interests between public disclosure and the pri- vacy of physicians and patients.” TMA, AMA, and other physician orga- nizations urged Medicare officials to fo- cus on data releases that seek to improve health care quality, ensure the accuracy of the data they release, and monitor any public reporting of the information to guard against potential abuses that could harm physicians’ reputations or livelihoods. Mr. Blum said CMS takes those con- cerns seriously. “As CMS makes a deter- mination about how and when to dis- close any information on a physician’s Medicare payment, we intend to con- sider the importance of protecting physi- cians’ privacy and ensuring the accuracy of any data released, as well as appropri- ate protections to limit potential misuse of the information. And as always, we are committed to protecting the privacy of Medicare beneficiaries.” n


Amy Lynn Sorrel is associate editor of Texas Medicine. You can reach her by telephone at (800) 880-1300, ext. 1392, or (512) 370-1392; by fax at (512) 370-1629; or by email at amy.sorrel@texmed.org.


34 TEXAS MEDICINE March 2014


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68