INSIDER | COLUMN
Since that time, some 2,470,000 industrial robots have been installed in factories around the world, with between 1,235,000 and 1,500,000 units operational at the end of 2012 (World Robotics 2013). Hardly a car production line now exists without robots performing such tasks as welding, handling and spraying. Robots have also found jobs in many other industrial sectors including the electrical/electronics, rubber and plastics and food sectors. In addition, there are millions of service robots, in professional applications (defence, healthcare, security, rescue, etc.) or personal and domestic use (homecare, vacuum cleaning, lawn mowing, entertainment, etc.).
Associated with the rise in robot numbers is the reduction in their costs which started in the 1980s. For example, back then, we paid c. £25,000 for a PUMA robot and £40,000 for a Unimate for our laboratory. Although one can no longer buy machines equivalent to the latter, for about the same price as one PUMA, we recently obtained two more powerful Kuka robots for our new Masters programme in Advanced Mechanical Engineering. We also purchased a twin-armed Baxter complete with vision sensing for even less money.
A critical factor in this robot cost reduction is the decrease in the costs and dimensions of computers and the increase in their powers. Another factor is the positive feedback that operates between cost and quantity: the more robots we produce, the lower they cost; the lower the robots cost, the more robots we use and produce, etc. This virtuous circle will prove important in the
future when organisations such as Foxconn flood the market with millions more machines. The majority of them will go into jobs that have been robotised successfully, because, as I have observed over the years, once a job has been successfully robotised, it will remain so. This leads us to a law to complement Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics. Whereas Asimov’s laws have been violated (e.g. the First Law about not injuring a human being or allowing a human being to come to harm), given the evidence and circumstances to date — escalation in wages, rise in robot capability, fall in robot costs, need for machines to work in jobs unsafe or impossible for people — Pham’s Fourth Law of Robotics which says that “Robotisation is irreversible” is likely to be unbreakable. Thus, once robots have conquered an area, they will occupy it in perpetuity. The robots have come. They are here to stay.
<< Figure 2: Kuka robot. >>
<< Figure 1: Baxter robot. >>
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ schools/mechanical-engineering/
index.aspx
48 | commercial micro manufacturing international Vol 7 No.1
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52