This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
equilibrium, along with the first casting (4) poured with an insert. Tirty-eight step castings were


investigated in subsequent studies. As a rule, the same casting conditions were applied three times to assess the repeatability of the measured adher- ence and heat transfer coefficients for the steel rods and copper tubes, respectively. Metallographic and SEM microscopy around the interface were performed on some of those castings and radiographic shots allowed for verification of possible voids at the casting-insert interface.


Steel-Aluminum Mechanical Adherence


When overcasting steel rods, the usual property required is the mechanical adherence at the steel- aluminum interface. Te adherence along the rod was measured in kPa, or Newton per mm2


• Casting temperature at the inter- face when the insert reaches its maximum temperature.


• Time necessary to reach the liquidus.


• Time elapsed between the begin- ning and end of solidification (local solidification time). Te punch and die used to measure


Fig. 3. These are tubes and rods before preheating.


of interface. Tis


was done for pouring temperatures of 1,310F (710C) and 1,400F (760C) and insert initial temperatures of 77F (25C) and 617F (325C) at six loca- tions in the insert. Te steel insert was sectioned into


six slices, as illustrated in Fig. 6. A con- sequence of the symmetry is that each casting provides three repeated local solidification conditions. For instance, slices 3L and 3R in Fig. 6 are subjected to the same local solidification condi- tions. Te solidification time maps shown correspond to the solidifica- tion time for a pouring temperature of 1,310F (710C) and an insert at an initial temperature of 77F (25C). Te four conditions (two pouring tempera- tures and two insert initial tempera- tures) were modeled using a value of 1,550 W/m2


/°C for the mold-casting


interface heat transfer coefficient and a filling time of four seconds. Te results are shown in Table 1. At any time, the numerical solu-


tion provides the thermal conditions at each point inside the insert, the casting and at the interface. Tis data is useful to find the best correlation between the insert-casting mechanical adherence and an adequate thermal parameter such as: • Maximum insert temperature at the interface.


52 | MODERN CASTING February 2014


Fig. 4. This is the flat face of a step casting before ejection.


the force necessary to extract the insert from its overcast aluminum is shown in Fig. 7. By dividing the measured force by the surface area of the steel- aluminum interface, a value for the adherence is obtained in MPa (or ksi). Te maximum force is reached as soon as slip occurs at the steel-aluminum interface. Figure 8 shows a steel rod partially pushed out following the adherence test. Te best correlation was obtained when the adherence was plotted against the local solidification time, i.e., the time elapsed between the beginning and end of solidification. For the range of local solidification times investigated (from 45 to 65 seconds) the adherence tends to be higher for shorter solidification time. Te adherence of the insert was


found to be roughly divided by two when applying a T6 treatment to the aluminum casting.


The Copper-Aluminum Interface When overcasting copper tubes,


Fig. 5. These are the first four castings of a campaign.


was determined for pouring tem- peratures of 1,310F (710C) and 1,400F (760C) and copper tube initial temperatures of 77F (25C) and 617F (325C). Te 1-in. (25mm) thick plate of


the prevailing property required is a good thermal contact at the copper-aluminum interface. Tis thermal contact is expressed as a surface heat transfer coefficient, hAl-Cu


, measured in W/m2


/°C; hAl-Cu


Fig. 6. Sectioning the 25mm plate into six samples is illustrated.


the casting was cut off, and thermo- regulated hot water was pumped through the copper tube at a constant rate of 2.1 qt. (2 L)/min. An exposed junction thermocouple was inserted at the very center of the aluminum block (see Fig. 9). As the water flow initiated, the rise in temperature was recorded at one acquisition per sec- ond. For the four casting conditions


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84