92
Legal Focus
OCTOBER 2013
Professional Negligence
This month we speak to Damian Croucher from Churchgate Legal LLP, a niche litigation and commercial property law solicitor’s practice. Here he tells us about his work within the sphere of Professional Negligence and the notable cases he has been involved in recently.
Please introduce yourself, your role and your firm.
Churchgate Legal has extensive experience in dealing with our specialist areas, so our lawyers are quickly able to assimilate complex problems and analyse the legal position giving our clients the best chance of a successful outcome.
I have specialised in professional negligence for over 12 years. I fight for justice for clients who have been the victims of negligent solicitors' (and other professionals') advice with a view to maximising their compensation and recovering all their losses. Clients know that I always take their cases personally, which is perhaps why I have never lost a professional negligence claim.
Much of my work is on an agreed fee basis, in order to keep my client's personal outlay in achieving justice as low as possible. The real value to my clients however is in the successful outcomes I achieve.
I write extensively on professional negligence issues through Ezine Articles, Guides, blogs and other media. I am a member of the Professional Negligence Lawyer's Association (PNLA) and the Commercial Litigation Association (CLAN).
I also act for commercial clients' disputes with the same vigour and enthusiasm. I aim to achieve 90% client satisfaction in order to develop long term relationships with my clients.
can you please tell us about any recent notable cases you/your firm have been involved in?
Reported case: • Aceramais Holdings Ltd v Hadleigh Partnership Ltd [2009] EWHC 1664 (TCC) - Our Mr Marshall acted for the defendant in
www.lawyer-monthly.com
successfully dismissing a part 8 claim by the claimant regarding a declaration that the contract was not in writing for the purposes of Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
The claim arose out from the
defendant’s part 7 enforcement of an adjudication decision for unpaid costs valued at approximately £800,000.
• Representing an established architect in a £2.5 million pounds claim brought by the claimant developer for alleged professional negligence. The case was settled in the architect’s favour with no payment of damages.
• Representing two individuals in a Building Act notice brought by a Council for repairs to a retaining wall, and has settled both outside of the court;
• Represented an individual in response to a claim brought by a contractor for alleged unpaid costs and settled the claim in the individual’s favour without payment of any costs;
• Represented a developer on a multi-million pound development in respect of a dispute with an established contractor and in which the developer was successful in dismissing a claim for an extension of time and claiming liquidated damages;
• Represented two clients in a professional negligence claim in respect of retirement properties in Egypt where a firm of solicitors in England had acted for them in the sales. Our clients paid all of the money required by the developer but could not get access to their properties and that the properties may have been “double sold” to another buyer. Our investigations revealed that the solicitors had
failed to carry out the proper due diligence checks to ensure that the terms of the sale contract between the seller and our clients to protect their interests. We argued that the solicitors had been negligent and were successful in recovering 90% of our clients’ outlays for the property plus costs;
• We represented clients in a professional negligence claim where the clients had lost a court claim where the solicitors had failed in its duty to consider after the event insurance. Our client alleged negligence. The defendant’s insurers agreed to pay 75% of our clients’ claimed damages, plus their costs;
• We represented our client in professional negligence against a solicitor who had acted in a lease purchase where our client had not been properly advised about an onerous rent review clause. The solicitors' insurers then admitted liability and, as a consequence, we were able to recover substantial damages for our client, together with her legal costs. LM
contact: churchgate Legal LLP 14 Park Road Whitchurch cardiff cF14 7Bq
tel: 029 20 660 157 Fax: 029 20 660 158 Website:
www.churchgatelegal.co.uk Email:
enquiries@churchgatelegal.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140