This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
THE RAJYA SABHA


Opposite page: India Gate in New Delhi; This page: Parliament House.


parliamentary standing committees were established in the Indian Parliament in 1993 following the pattern of the select committees of the United Kingdom House of Commons which were introduced there in 1979 to examine the policies and programmes of individual government departments. Normally in India both the Houses of Parliament have been referring almost all Bills to the relevant department-related parliamentary standing committee for scrutiny and examination. As of now the Rajya Sabha has referred some of the Bills to its select committee for examination and report even though such Bills have been already examined by a department-related parliamentary standing committee and passed by the Lok Sabha. So far the Lok Sabha has not done such a thing.


The foundational philosophy


behind the reference of Bills to committees of both the Houses of Parliament or a committee of either House has been to enable deep examination and reassessment of their scope and thematic content. It is quite usual to refer Bills, introduced in either House, to a department-related parliamentary standing committee operating under the control of one House but consisting of Members of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, or to a select committee of either House. However, it is rare to see a Bill referred to a select committee of the Rajya Sabha after it has been thoroughly examined by a department-related standing committee and passed by the Lok Sabha. When the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011, to set up an ombudsman at the national and state


level, was taken up in the Rajya Sabha for consideration and passage on 21 May 2012, a Member of the House moved an amendment to refer it to a select committee of the Council. The Lokpal Bill 2011 was first


introduced in the Lok Sabha in 2011. It was then referred to the Department Related Parliamentary Standing on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice (functioning under the Rajya Sabha) which after detailed examination recommended alterations and accordingly reported to the Lok Sabha. The House debated and passed the legislation and transmitted it to the Council of States. When the Bill was being taken up for consideration, a Member of that House moved a motion and the Bill was referred to a select committee. This was the third time that a Bill


examined by a department-related standing committee of Parliament and passed by the Lok Sabha had been referred to a select committee of Rajya Sabha. It happened for the first time on 7 August 1995 when the Rajya Sabha took a unanimous decision to refer the Trade Marks Bill, 1995, which was examined by the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry (functioning under the Rajya Sabha) and passed by the Lok Sabha, to its select committee for further scrutiny and examination. Again on 4 August 1997 the Rajya Sabha took a decision to refer the Coast Guard (Amendment) Bill, 1996 to its select committee even though it was examined by the Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence and passed by the Lok Sabha.


The Parliamentarian | 2013: Issue One | 59


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92