This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
SUSTAINABLE AFFORDABLE HEALTHCARE


“Only by working together now can we make changes that benefit the whole population that do not disadvantage some of the most vulnerable population groups. We need to have orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners and managerial staff working closely together in both the primary and secondary care settings to ensure the best, appropriate, most cost-effective care for our patients.”


effective treatment whilst providing value for money for the taxpayer or insurer. This massive and increasing workload and disparity in service provision needs to be tackled by a medium- to long-term action plan which needs be removed from politics. Changes must be implemented that will benefit the whole population. The primary and secondary care sectors need to work more closely together to ensure the best, most cost-effective care for patients. Orthopaedics in the United


pressure to perform more efficiently yet maintaining its high standards of care.


There have been some high-


profile examples where this has failed and this has been a salutary lesson to everyone. It is not too late to solve this problem if it is acted upon now. Guidelines for referral and


treatment pathways are essential to try to contain cost and ensure patients receive the most appropriate and


Kingdom has been neglected, even though it is one of the most referred- to specialties. The three main areas that need addressing to move forward in orthopaedics in the U.K. are: • Appropriate primary care path- ways with a referral system designed to allow the right patient to be seen by the right specialist at the right place at the right time. There is also a need for co-operation between the patient and the primary care practitioner to ensure that patients maintain a healthy lifestyle and reasonable bodyweight. • Delivering Secondary Care “Getting it right first time”, a report published in September 2012, high- lighted the problems but also sug- gested solutions whereby reducing complications and improving quality of care could make significant annual savings; and • Appropriate patient follow-up.


To meet the increasing demand


and patient expectations in a challenging economic climate we need to recognize the value of improving the quality of patient


outcomes and the role that the frontline specialists can play. In a perfect society, there would


be no limit on healthcare spending to maintain the health of its population. The expectations of patients are increasing and will continue to do so. In order to fulfil these expectations, the NHS has been forced to change. Recently it did this by setting targets backed up by a managerial team to enforce the changes. The laudable aim was to reduce waiting times for outpatient and inpatient procedures, not the quality of care provided. This may at first sound very reassuring; but if you had a choice to have a treatment quicker which had a higher chance of failure or a slightly increased wait with a better outcome in the long-term, there is an obvious choice.


Patients would rather travel further


for better, higher-quality care in one location rather than a short distance for a poor service. Concentrating on waiting times rather than quality has led the NHS to overspend, which is now unsustainable as there has to be a balance between funding and service provision, especially in an economic downturn. The focused partnership of the


British Orthopaedic Association, its specialist societies, frontline hospital specialists together with GPs in Commissioning Consortia is the way forward to provide the population with access to high-quality care at the right time whilst ensuring the best use of taxpayers’ money. There has to be a new open and


honest relationship between senior management within the NHS and


orthopaedic clinicians to ensure this. If this fails then changes made may not be in the best interest of the patients and will ultimately lead to rationing of healthcare as demand becomes unaffordable. Instead of orthopaedic departments and clinicians acting alone, they will form part of a network of hospitals and treatment centres forming Specialist Units and working to quality assurance standards. This will generate standardized protocols for implants and treatment pathways across the NHS, to the benefit of patients. Protocols will be based on either their own accrued evidence or from the published literature or joint registries.


Working together to get it right the first time It is predicted that by introducing such changes, just in orthopaedics, will save the NHS over £2 billion over the next three to five years. If “Getting it Right First Time”, which is to be piloted across the NHS in England, is successful, then it is likely that other specialties will follow suit. Only by working together now


can we make changes that benefit the whole population that do not disadvantage some of the most vulnerable population groups. We need to have orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners and managerial staff working closely together in both the primary and secondary care settings to ensure the best, appropriate, most cost-effective care for our patients. These changes must be led by frontline clinicians to ensure success.


The Parliamentarian | 2013: Issue One | 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92