This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Viewpoint | Robert Boardman


Should we be afraid of Goethe’s Apprentice?


As the European Union moves towards the implementation of a Financial Transaction Tax on 1st January 2014, Rob Boardman of ITG reviews the causes and consequences of this great experiment in taxation policy.


In Goethe’s poem The Sorcerer’s Apprentice the well-meaning trainee attempts to invoke powerful magic learned from his master to do his housework, but soon realises that he cannot control the forces he has unleashed. In 2011 the European Commission President, José Manuel Barroso proposed a new experiment to invoke the magic of revenue-raising through a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), based on a model proposed by the Nobel Prize winning economist James Tobin. Yet other economists and market participants fear the FTT will cause unintended negative consequences. Perhaps European policy makers, rather like Goethe’s apprentice, have not fully anticipated the destructive power of Tobin’s magic. But should we be fearful of the European FTT?


Certainly the experience of Sweden, which adopted a FTT in the mid-1980s, is not encouraging. After introducing a tax on trading in Swedish stocks, bonds and derivatives, transaction volumes fell, and trading moved offshore. Predictably, taxation revenues were much lower than anticipated, liquidity in stocks and (especially) bonds dropped alarmingly, and the futures market was all but eliminated. Eventually the Swedish government admitted defeat and by 1992 had abandoned the tax completely. So why has the idea resurfaced now?


Since the financial crisis started in 2007, the media and politicians have accused banks of creating markets which made credit (particularly sub-prime mortgages) too easily available because


40


risk could be transferred (e.g. via credit derivatives) without accountability. The fact that some banks had to be rescued with public money made them doubly targeted. Of course regulators and credit- rating agencies had their part to play in the crisis, but policy makers are now focused on reducing “speculative” trading in financial instruments. Another factor exposed by the financial crisis was the large budget deficits built up by many European governments. So the FTT kills two birds with one stone: raise money to plug the public finances by imposing a tax which throttles financial market trading. Simple in theory, but will the new European FTT suffer the same fate as Sweden’s? European policy makers have tried to learn the


lessons from the Swedish experience. The process approved at the 22nd January ECOFIN meeting, and revised proposals published on 14th February, although not near to being definitive, crucially are structured to tax “resident” traders irrespective of where the transaction occurs. Furthermore the FTT contains exemptions on transactions involving central banks. These measures are designed to ensure trade cannot simply move offshore and that central bank financing operations avoid the difficulties encountered by the Swedish government. So if anti-avoidance measures work, how much money could the tax raise? Well that depends on the tax rate imposed and how much transaction turnover falls. Assuming a 10 basis point tax on purchases and sales of shares and bonds, and one basis point tax on derivatives, the official European


Best Execution | Spring 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100