Market Opinion | Jannah Patchay
revenue streams, but also enable them to fulfil their core function of helping companies gain access to capital?
One thing is certain; doing more of the same simply isn’t going to work. Market conditions have changed, perhaps permanently, and exchanges must adapt their business models if they are to compete in this new landscape. However, it isn’t all dismal news. There are examples of successful exchange innovation that fulfil investor and issuer needs, which can be found in some unexpected places. A recent industry conference provided several examples from smaller exchanges attempting to find their own path to success whilst also building the economies and markets in which they operate. Interestingly, their ambitions were often not constrained within their own geographic boundaries. We often hear government ministers preach to businesspeople that small to medium enterprises (SMEs) are the key to economic growth, particularly in times of global recession such as the one we find ourselves in currently. This is true of not only developed markets such as the EU and the US but also of emerging markets, in which the ability to operate a main market hinges on the creation of an SME market to feed into it. Most SME markets have struggled with the issues of good governance and liquidity. On the one hand, many SMEs do not have the capacity to show compliance with onerous listing requirements. On the other hand, good corporate governance, transparency and accountability to investors are absolutely necessary to build investor confidence and therefore liquidity in the market.
Having examined this problem in detail, one of the Caribbean exchanges has set about implementing an SME market that is built on principles of good governance and investor confidence. Each issuer must have an approved “mentor”, whose role is to ensure that the company complies fully with its listing and governance requirements. The exchange has negotiated with its local government to obtain generous tax incentives for companies remaining listed on the market, without suspension, for a minimum period
24
of 15 years, including a full 5-year tax holiday for these companies. Companies failing to meet their listing requirements for the duration are required to repay any tax benefits accrued. There is therefore a powerful financial motivation for companies to list in the first place, to remain listed, and to ensure that their governance standards are high. As investor confidence in the quality of issuers grows, so too will liquidity in this market. There has also been much recent discussion of the use of crowd-funding as means for exchanges to build IPO pipelines. For the majority of SMEs, funding requirements are in the order of £10,000 – £250,000. These firms are poorly serviced by the current financial market structure – they are too small for even the SME exchanges (and their business models are not yet developed enough for an IPO), and where they are able to obtain corporate financing through bank lending, interest rates are prohibitively high. The traditional sources of private investment – private equity, venture capital and angel investment are either out of their reach or would require giving up control of the direction of their businesses at a crucial stage in development. Crowd-funding provides a neat solution; companies can obtain funding at low cost from enthusiastic investors, sometimes in exchange for no more than sample products or free services, but increasingly in exchange for equity. An enterprising exchange, seeing a decline in IPOs on the main market, might look to the future and seek to build up a pipeline of SMEs that will one day IPO on first its junior and then main market. Creation of an exchange-hosted and operated crowd-funding platform would provide an ideal incubator and indeed create a whole ecosystem for funding companies from early-stage capital through to IPO and subsequent debt issues. There is also potential to create a range of new tradable instruments for a crowd-financing model, from debt to future income-related payment streams.
The Equities market may never be the same again, but that is not to say that it will not thrive in the future, in ways which we are only beginning to imagine now. ■
Best Execution | Spring 2013
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100