This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trading | Execution consulting


of other regulations. Liquidity has been scattered across a wider array of dark and lit pools and while the once cutting edge tools of direct market access and smart order routing have a place, buyside firms also want a more nuanced approach to the changing market structure. In the US alone, TABB Group figures show that fund management firms currently execute 48% of their US equity order electronically over 65 trading venue using more than 600 broker- built algorithms, thousands of smart order routing logic solutions and an endless stream of post- trade transaction cost analysis data. “Execution consulting is becoming a big topic as the electronic component has become bigger,” says Adam Toms, chief executive of Instinet Europe. “It is not just about execution but the advanced analytic product set. I think it will become more important because buyside traders are focusing more on the value that their brokers are creating.”


Different options Of course there is no one size fits all strategy and each brokerage firm has its own spin. There are common threads though in that they all are aiming to offer more of a personalised and tailored service. This ranges from high touch advisory and trade and risk execution analysis to real time tools for live insights, according to the Aite report. For example, Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML) offers bespoke analytics to expose trends and opportunities to enhance the trading style or strategy customisation while Citi dissects algorithms and monitors the liquidity they interact with in order to improve performance. Both global banks also have the advantage of being able to leverage their group’s wide range of expertise on multiple disciplines, risk management, transaction cost analysis and quantitative research. Bloomberg Tradebook, on the other hand, has dynamic execution consulting which includes flexible order delivery solutions, pre-trade analysis and tools, real-time trade implementation analytics and alerts as well as post trade analysis. It also offers trading workflow consultations, customised client workflow solutions, education and training,


Best Execution | Spring 2013


“I think it will become more important because buyside traders are focusing more on the value that their brokers are creating.”


Adam Toms, Instinet Europe


market structure and regulatory commentary plus trade optimisation analysis and feedback “Execution advisory services started on the


programme-trading side with pre and post- trade reporting,” says Francois Banneville, global head of execution services at Société Générale. “Before you executed the order you would look at the names, illiquidity, size and the best way to execute the program. Today, it is trickier because the markets are more complex and fragmented with different exchanges, dark pools and broker crossing networks. As a result, execution advisory services are much more technical and quantitative and linked to the microstructure. Clients want much more detail, a greater understanding of what makes prices move and more analysis on their trades. There is also a much greater awareness of benchmarks and performances. We look at up to 50 parameters and statistical indicators when we execute an order.”


Chris Jackson, EMEA head of execution sales also notes that high frequency trading and regulation have created a much more challenging environment: “The terms of TCA have become far more complex – historically relatively few tools were available – VWAP and Implementation Shortfall being two of the most prevalent.” In recent years though, in an effort to reconcile opposing variables like market impact and time risk, TCA providers have developed increasingly complex measures often relying on complex and obscure proprietary calculations. “This has led to more rather than less confusion and uncertainty around what constitutes good execution.” “We are able to analyse a client’s trading style and work with them to customise our trading platform to suit these objectives. We’ve worked


27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100