This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Challenges Facing Commodity


Futures Market Participants: The Anti-Speculation Cycle, the RORO Environment, & Position Limits. By Hilary Till


PROFESSOR SCOTT IRWIN of the University of Illinois has argued that there is a reasonably predictable “anti-speculation cycle” due to periodic bouts of inflation and deflation in commodity prices (Figure 1). Therefore, market participants have an obligation to periodically explain the economic role of futures trading and the role of speculators in these markets. This will be the main task of this article. In addition,we discuss two other challenges facing market participants: the impact of the Risk On / Risk Off (RORO) environment in managing commodity risk, and the prospects for the imposition of commodity position limits.


Economic Role of Hedgers & Speculators What is the economic role of hedgers and speculators in the commodity futures markets? We will start by noting that the terms, “hedging” and “speculation,” are not precise, as discussed in Till (2012a, 2012b). A commodity merchant who hedges inventories creates a “basis” position and is then subject to the volatility of the relationship between the spot price and the futures price of the commodity. The merchant is, in effect, speculating on the “basis.” The basis relationship tends to be more stable and predictable than the outright price of the commodity, which means that the merchant can confidently hold more commodity inventories than otherwise would be the case. What futures markets make possible is the specialization of risk- taking rather than the elimination of risk. Who would take the other side of the commercial


hedger’s position? Answer: A speculator who specializes in that risk bearing. The speculator may be an expert in the term structure of a futures curve and would spread the position taken on from the commercial hedger against a futures contract in another maturity of the futures curve. Or the speculator may spread the position against a related commodity. Till and Eagleeye (2004, 2006) provide examples of both intra-market spreading and inter-market spreading, which arise from such risk-bearing. Alternatively, the speculator may detect trends


resulting from the impact of a commercial’s hedging activity, and be able to manage taking on an outright position from a commercial because the speculator has created a large portfolio of


unrelated trades. Presumably, the speculator will be able to dampen the risk of an outright commodity position because of the diversification provided by other unrelated trades in the speculator’s portfolio. In this example, the speculator’s risk-bearing specialization comes from the astute application of portfolio theory.


What futures markets make possible is the specialization of risk-taking rather than the elimination of risk


What then is the economic role of commodity speculation and its “value to society”? Ultimately, successful commodity speculation results from becoming an expert in risk bearing. This profession enables commercial entities to privately finance and hold more commodity inventories than


Figure 1: The Anti Speculation Cycle Price Consumer Complaints


Producer Complaints Time Source: Irwin (2012), Slide 46.


otherwise would be the case because they can lay off the dangerously volatile commodity price risk to price-risk specialists. Those commercial entities can then focus on their area of specialty: the physical creation, handling, transformation, and transportation of the physical commodity. Cootner (1961) wrote that in the absence of being able to hedge inventories, a commercial participant would not rationally hold “large inventories … unless the expected price increase


March 2013 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84