MERCHANDISER
Global Trade Increasingly Dominated by Complex &
Circuitous Routes GLOBAL TRADE IS increasingly dominated by the complex and circuitous routes followed by goods and services as they are upgraded into finished products, a new UNCTAD report says. These “global value chains” (GVCs), orchestrated for the most part by transnational corporations (TNCs), offer opportunities for poor countries to gain access to international markets, just as they offer opportunities for statistical confusion to economists. The ever-more complicated webs of investment and trade,
by which raw materials extracted in one country may be exported to a second country for processing, then exported again to a manufacturing plant in a third country, which may then export to a fourth country for final consumption, is the topic of the UNCTAD report entitled GVCs and Development: Investment and Value Added Trade in the Global Economy. The report says that the value chains administered in
various ways by TNCs now account for 80% of the $20 trillion in trade each year. It also says that the relentless zigzagging across borders
of goods and services as they are upgraded means that some 28% of the value of this trade – or about $5 trillion – is overstated through double counting. For example, the export value of copper ore extracted in one country counts once as a contribution to that nation’s gross domestic product (GDP), but then is counted again – as many as several times – as it progresses from raw to upgraded to finished goods as it is exported after processing.
Key Report Findings
• Global investment and trade are thoroughly entwined in international production networks. This is especially true of TNCs investing in productive assets worldwide, as they manage trading inputs and outputs in cross-border value chains that often are highly complex. Such value chains account for some 80% of global trade.
• GVCs are responsible for significant and growing instances of double counting in global trade figures. The
new data shows that some 28% of gross exports consist of value added that is first imported by countries only to be incorporated into products or services that are then exported again. Thus, some $5 trillion out of the $19 trillion of recorded global gross exports in 2010 was actually double-counted.
• GVCs make extensive use of services. While the share of services in gross exports worldwide is only around 20%,
almost half (46%) of value added in exports is contributed by services sector activities, as most manufacturing exports require services (such as engineering work, software development, and marketing) for their production. In fact, a significant part of the international production networks of TNCs is geared towards providing services inputs, with more than 60% of global foreign direct investment channelled to services activities. By comparison, 26% of FDI goes to manufacturing and 7% to the primary goods sector
and is similar for developed and developing economies.
• The majority of developing countries, including the poorest, are increasingly participating in GVCs. The developing-country share in global value-added trade increased from 20% in 1990 to 30% in 2000, and is over 40% today. Again, the role of TNCs is critical, as countries with a higher presence of FDI relative to the size of their economies tend to have a higher level of participation in GVCs and a greater relative share in global value-added trade compared to their share of global exports.
• GVC links in developing countries can play an important role in economic growth. Domestic value-added
– that is, an improved capacity of an economy to produce a broader variety of goods, and goods of greater complexity – resulting from GVC trade can be very significant relative to the size of local economies. In developing economies, value-added trade contributes some 28% to countries’ GDPs on average, as compared to 18% for developed economies. Furthermore, there appears to be a positive correlation between participation in GVCs and GDP per capita growth rates. The economies with the fastest-growing GVC participation have GDP per capita growth rates some 2 percentage points above average.
• There appear to be a number of GVC development paths available to developing countries, including “engaging” in
GVCs, “upgrading” along GVCs, and “leapfrogging” and “competing” via GVCs. The best development outcomes may result from an increase in GVC participation and a move towards higher domestic value added in trade at the same time. Countries that, over the last 20 years, have managed to increase both their participation in GVCs and their domestic value added in exports have experienced GDP per capita growth of 3.4% on average, compared to 2.2% for countries that only increased their participation in GVCs without “upgrading” their domestic value addition.
These findings have important policy implications. Describing the situation, UNCTAD Secretary-General Supachai Panitchpakdi notes: “Global value chains are everywhere. They show that investment and trade are two sides of the same coin. Policymakers have to take into account both sides when thinking about economic growth and development.” GVCs can be an important way for developing countries
to build their productive capacities, including through technology dissemination and skill building, the report confirms. They can also open up opportunities for longer- term industrial upgrading. However, such potential benefits of GVCs are not automatic. Governments need well-focused and mutually reinforcing strategies for trade and investment – and for development generally – that encourage upgrading of their productive capacities.
UNCTAD intends to build on the preliminary analyses of the new data presented in this launch publication in its forthcoming World Investment Report 2013, which will examine the mechanisms through which GVCs can contribute to development, as well as the risks involved for developing countries (such as social challenges and environmental concerns, and the risk of remaining locked into low-value-added activities).
www.unctad.org March 2013 21
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84