This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
UNITED KINGDOM


COALITION GOVERNMENT FACES ITS FIRST DEFEAT IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS


EU Budget


A debate on European Union Documents No. 16844/11, No. 16845/11, No. 16846/11, No. 16847/11, No. 16848/11, No. 6708/12 and Addenda 1–3, No. 9007/12, No. 12356/12, and No. 13620/12 may not sound like an occasion that would get parliamentary pulses racing. However, these technical- sounding documents related to the proposal for the European Union budget (the “multiannual financial framework’”or MFF) and proved to be the occasion of the coalition government’s first defeat in the House of Commons. The agreement of the MFF


is complex. The European Commission first makes a proposal – a 6.8-per-cent rise in funding for 2018. It then goes to the European Parliament and also the Council of Ministers – the governments of the 27 Member states – for decision. The European Parliament supported the Commission’s proposal, whilst the Council of Ministers proposed a 2.79-per-cent rise instead. In principle, a deal has to be agreed between Heads of Government at the European Council in November. In the U.K., the Commission’s


proposal is subject to the terms of the Parliamentary Scrutiny Reserve Resolution. This means that the government cannot sign up to the proposal at a European level until it has been the subject of a report by the European Scrutiny Committees in both


Flags in front of the European Commission building in Brussels.


Houses of Parliament. The House of Commons committee recommended that the issue should be subject to debate on


The government proposed Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP


the Floor of the House and the debate took place on 31 October 2012.


a motion criticizing the Commission’s proposal for the budget increase and stating that “payment appropriations should increase, at most, by no more than inflation over the next financial perspectives”. Moving the motion, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP, (Con), stated that: “Frankly, the sheer lack of shame displayed by those demanding more of our money is extraordinary. They want more at a time when the International Monetary Fund predicts that government spending across the EU will fall by more than eight per cent between 2010 and 2017. They want more at a time when Mr Barroso, the European


Commission’s President, has said: “public finances must be consolidated” and that “sound public finances are needed to restore confidence that is so


Mr Mark Reckless, MP


essential for growth.” However, the motion was


The Parliamentarian | 2012: Issue Four | 317


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112