This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PLENARY SESSION - SOCIAL MEDIA AND POLITICS


of the United Kingdom presented the conference with an ongoing example of how to use the social media effectively. Explaining that his Branch and his Region were supporting the addition to the Commonwealth Games of events for the disabled along the lines of the Paralympics which had recently been staged very highly successfully in London, he said he and others had Tweeted the idea and were getting a huge positive response very quickly. This generated support for the idea and demonstrated that the Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference was active and involved. Tanzanian MP Hon. Zitto Kabwe


presented other examples, explaining that Members had used the social media to generate support for changes to the copyright laws to protect authors’ rights. Members could also use the social


media to mobilize support for censure motions against Ministers. Mr John Hargreaves, MLA,


of the Australian Capital Territory suggested cabinet meetings could be conducted on Twitter for a set period to enable Ministers to respond to the public. However, he also warned that governments can seek to block information by using their control over the relay infrastructure.


Information overload A Member from the Isle of Man, Hon. Steve Rodan, SHK, voiced concerns about the effect of technology on the work of Members. How do Members


manage the communications expectations of constituents who look for instant responses rather than considered responsible answers? The quantity of information has expanded, but has the quality of information suffered? Baroness Gardner of Parkes


said that as a Member of the United Kingdom Parliament’s upper House she had little help to deal with the flood of information. A Member who answered everything he or she received would have no time to do anything else. She added that communications


advances made possible many changes to work practices which did not contribute to healthy living, including moving children away from exercise. Prof. Unwin suggested developing


strategies on the use of technology such as making full use of automated responses which are becoming more sophisticated. Mr Hiebert said his automated


email response asks senders to send him their name and postal address if they want an answer. He only answers by mail. He also advised Members to set up group pages on Facebook so no responses were required. He added that these sites should


be monitored so inappropriate comments could be removed quickly.


Stopping misinformation Mr Rodan was among several speakers who questioned how


Members can differentiate between good and unreliable information and how they avoid having their communications systems swamped by material from pressure groups or other interests. Hon. Request Muntanga,


MP, of Zambia also sought ways of separating true information from misleading material, asking how the electronic publication of misinformation can be stopped. Processes to stop or minimize


the publication of false or misleading information was also sought by Hon. Lebohang Ntsinyi, MP, of Lesotho. She suggested that guidelines or good practices for the successful handling of electronic information could be developed. Dr the Hon. A. Chakrapani, MLC,


of Andhra Pradesh agreed that social media and other electronic sources can pose serious problems when they publish unreliable information. He asked how they could be controlled. Raising a different type of problem


produced by the new technologies, Hon. Christine Bako Abia, MP, of Uganda reported that students writing examinations had begun using some of the shorthand abbreviations developed in text messaging.


A careful response Shri Kurien said governments are examining the issue of how – and whether – to try to control what is published on the internet. Mr Hiebert warned that attempts to regulate content or enforce


codes of conduct would have to be considered very carefully. He recommended publicae.net as a safe internet resource designed for politicians which published content on which they could rely. Prof. Unwin, however, pointed


to an unintended benefit from the publication of both reliable information and misinformation: learning to separate good information from bad is a valuable ability to teach young people. He and Mr Hiebert agreed


that social media are still relatively recent phenomena and unintended consequences are still being identified. For example, Prof. Unwin pointed to concerns in China that the rapidly growing use of mobile phones is leading to a decline in the ability of students to write Chinese characters. He added, however, that advances in technology could soon provide electronic alternatives to the ability to read and write. Mr Hiebert added that the social


media have effectively opened a huge experimental area whose effects are still developing. This should not, however, be an excuse for Parliamentarians to avoid participating in this emerging form of communications. Shri Kurian also told Members


that while the social media is not universally available, it is still more accessible to the poor than other media are, and that it holds great potential to improve the lives of poor people in the future.


The Parliamentarian | 2012: Issue Four | 287


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112