NEWS Strawman model: ICANN responds to rights owners’ concerns
Trademark owners appear to have made headway in their long-running attempts to enhance the mechanisms for protecting their rights in the new gTLD space.
Following a private meeting on November 15 with IP owners and other groups, ICANN chief executive Fedi Chehadé has proposed a so-called strawman model. Te proposal meets some of the requests rights holders had made before the discussion in Los Angeles.
Te unapproved model, published in a blog post on November 19, also proposes a new mechanism to supplement the trademark claims period, which requires the Trademark Clearinghouse to send warnings to potential cybersquatters.
Before the meeting IP owners wanted the
trademark claims to extend from 60 days to an “indefinite” period. ICANN now proposes introducing a 90-day window.
Te strawman proposes adding a new ‘Claims 2’ period, which will last for six to 12 months and require an additional (undisclosed) fee. Te Clearinghouse
will continue sending notifications but will not necessarily provide the same information about registered trademarks as before. It is not clear why.
Under the model IP owners will able to register their marks along with up to 50 “abused variations” of them in the Clearinghouse, Chehadé said. At the moment, the central repository for marks will accept only identical matches.
Tere will be a test for these variations—such as whether they have been subject to a successful Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy filing or court proceeding.
Additionally, new gTLD operators will have to publish the dates and requirements of their sunrise periods 30 days before they launch. IP owners wanted ICANN to extend the sunrise period from 30 to 60 days.
Te meeting rejected the idea of a system that would permanently block certain trademarks at the second level.
Te proposals are not set in stone, and there will be follow-up calls with the groups in November
to review “additional feedback”, Chehadé said. He added that he will next focus on the Uniform Rapid Suspension System, a new but untested dispute resolution mechanism.
Te strawman model was criticised in a blog post by Robin Gross, who represented the Non- Commercial Stakeholders Group at the meeting. “Te strawman was discussed at the meeting many hours aſter the time that had been announced for policy discussions, and thus it was developed aſter many participants (including me) had already leſt the meeting to catch our flights back home.”
She added: “Te most troubling concern is that the Intellectual Property and Business constituencies keep coming again and again to renegotiate the same policies. It’s further upsetting that ICANN then feels pressured to develop policy proposals in this inappropriate manner.”
Separately, in a comment on Chehadé’s blog post, ICANN was criticised for holding the meeting behind closed doors, when “its DNA is openness and transparency”.
www.worldipreview.com Trademarks Brands and the Internet Volume 1, Issue 4 11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52