IP SUMMIT
Presumably most of the IP protection is in the form of copyright protection, but do you also have trademarks to deal with? How easy or otherwise is it to protect an artwork with trademarks?
Our natural protection comes from copyright laws but it’s far from sufficient, as many countries offer only very limited protection and some no protection at all, which leaves us unprotected and exposed to various infringements. Te Succession Picasso has learned over the years to work with all those foreign legislatures and through them to find ways to protect what needs to be protected: not only the works, but the name and the likeness of Picasso as well. In order to achieve this, the Succession Picasso has entered an ‘unnatural’ world: the world of trademarks and unfair competition regulations.
Te Succession Picasso now deals on a frequent basis with
trademark rights and purely
commercial issues, but the situation is never easy, first because Pablo Picasso is an artist and thus cannot be reduced to a simple trademark—this principle rules our every action in the trademark field; and second, Pablo Picasso originally acquired rights through his creativity, but dealing with trademarks means acquiring rights by registrations.
Tese are very different things, especially as a registered trademark requires commercial exploitation. Unlike
registrants that are
manufacturers, the Succession Picasso is not a manufacturer—it only licenses rights.
Since the Succession Picasso decided out of necessity to deal with trademark issues, it has had to face thousands of pre-existing trademark registrations made by
others without any
authorisation. Tese registrants have acquired private rights conflicting with the Succession Picasso’s legitimate rights.
What is the situation regarding protecting IP if the artwork in question is in private hands, or in a museum? Who owns what in terms of the IP in a given work of a particular artist?
Te Succession Picasso is the legitimate right holder. Te Succession Picasso is a joint ownership existing over the IP rights attached to the works and the name of Pablo Picasso. Te Succession Picasso by itself does not own any work. Its members do, individually, as Pablo Picasso’s heirs.
Under the provisions of copyright law, IP rights are completely distinct and separate from the ownership of the works. Tus the Succession Picasso is the sole owner of the IP rights attached to the works of Pablo Picasso, whether those
www.worldipreview.com
“WE THINK THAT THE PUBLIC DESERVES A RIGHT TO ACCESS A WORK WHICH RESPECTS THE
MORAL RIGHT OF THE ARTIST WHO CREATED THE WORK.”
high value and the art market requires certificates of authenticity from the Picasso family. Members of the family have recently decided to set up an organisation for handling the authentications. Tis new organisation will be targeted to secure the provenance of the works as there’s a lack of legitimate provenance when forgeries are at stake. Securing a provenance can only help us to fight the forgeries.
We have also to deal with all the websites and art data bank providers which offer for sale either ‘copies’ of protected art works, or works of art presented as original when they are not. Tose situations can be tackled from an IP perspective.
Are there particular paintings (Guernica might be one) whose cultural import becomes so profound that IP protection is not in the public interest?
works belong to members of the family, or to museums, or to private owners.
Who is responsible for licensing Picasso’s works?
One of the members of the Succession Picasso—Claude Ruiz Picasso—has been designated by the French judge to administer Pablo Picasso’s IP rights. Qualified as the administrator of the Succession Picasso, he is the one responsible for licensing Picasso’s works, name and likeness. In 1995 Mr Picasso set up a company called the Picasso Administration, which was given under his authority the responsibility for monitoring the rights of the Succession Picasso. On a daily basis, the Picasso Administration gives the authorisations requested in the name and on behalf of the Succession Picasso.
What about forgeries? Is this a common problem, and do you tackle it from an IP perspective?
Forgeries are a key issue for the Succession Picasso; the Picasso family spends time and money to secure the worldwide art market, preventing fakes and fighting them, and exposing them when they are offered for sale.
As time passes, it’s becoming clear that the forgery issue must be dealt with robustly. Te authentication process is a large part of strategy; the works of Pablo Picasso have a very
this
How could that work? Who would decide which the ‘particular’ paintings are? From a general standpoint, we can see copyright laws have taken public interest into account; this is the meaning of the ‘public domain’ and the exceptions to copyright existing in those regulations. Te legislator has considered the financial public interest by granting free use.
Te issue is to know whether the public interest is limited to an economic interest only. We don’t think so. We think that the public deserves a right to access a work which respects the moral right of the artist who created the work. Te reproductions must then respect the integrity of the original work.
Te Succession Picasso spends a lot of time controlling these moral rights, to make sure that the work is not cropped, that the original colours are preserved, and that the integrity of the work is respected.
IP protection means duties and responsibilities first: communicating correctly about Picasso’s artwork is certainly the most important duty of the Succession Picasso. Te public should also understand that those duties and responsibilities are very costly; royalties coming from the grant of rights help to fulfil duties and responsibilities such as securing the art market, granting loans of original artworks for them to be seen in public exhibitions, securing high quality reproduction materials, providing true information
and
sources, and fighting counterfeited works and forgeries.
Trademarks Brands and the Internet Volume 1, Issue 3 43
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56