This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
If someone in our industry behaves unethically, does the action reflect on?


CERTIFICATION MADE POSSIBLE THE ENTIRE PROFESSION THE PERSON ALONE 14%


60%


26%


THE PERSON AND THE PERSON’S EMPLOYER


like I did it intentionally. I simply brought it up to the [client] and said, ‘Oh, and by the way, these points are going to my company’s account’—and everybody was fine with that. But at the time I thought, ‘Hmm, I wonder if that puts me in a position of owing them something.’” Some planners believe that it might—and decline to accept


such bonuses. “Rewards points need to be designed to benefit the hosting organizations, not the planners who are signing the contracts,” one survey respondent wrote. “Although I receive points and miles for my organization’s meetings, I strictly redeem [them] for something that benefits the organization,” such as site visits, a master-account reduction, or conference registration fees. Gifts. Our survey also asked respondents whether their





“Sales departments are designed to get people to use their services (just like in any other industry), so I don’t think it is unethical for them to offer benefits to planners. However, it is up to the planner to make the final decision, keeping in mind that bad ones will affect their reputation. Some offers of thanks andappreciation are warranted, but the planner needs to use common sense as to what is appropriate andwhat is not.”


www.pcma.org


organization places a limit on the dollar amount allowed for “gifts and entertaining.” Thirteen percent said they have a $25 limit per item per vendor, 13 percent a $50 limit, and 11 percent a $100 limit—with the majority (63 percent) having no limit at all. This, Hilliard said, is where a written ethics policy comes in handy. That way, when planners receive, say, a solid gold pen from a supplier, they can look it up in the manual and easily determine whether it falls within the allowable dollar amount. But, still, meeting professionals must understand that no


matter the cost, a gift is never just a nice gesture. “There is a wishful thinking in meeting planning that is exactly the same in many other industries,” said Christopher Bauer, Ph.D., an ethics expert who spoke at PCMA’s 2008 annual meeting, “that marketing materials and marketing opportunities… somehow won’t affect my purchasing decisions.” With that in mind, Bauer recommends that planners do


two things. First, “forget this wishful-thinking nonsense that somehow marketing opportunities don’t change behavior; they change behavior routinely and effectively,” he said. Sec- ond, “remember that any time there is a monetary limit placed on a gift…it really is arbitrary. The reality is, who is going to coherently describe the difference between a $75 gift and a $125 gift?” In other words, you can’t just rely on policy: You have to


use your own judgment in concert with the guidelines your organization has in place. “I do keep it in the front of my mind,” O’Neill said, “that I’m making my decisions based on business facts and profit. I really can’t be bought for a free hotel night or a free lunch.”


Cracking the Code But if ethics guidelines aren’t available in the first place, you have nothing to go on but your own judgment, which often can be a recipe for disaster. And, unfortunately, a universally recognized, industry-wide code of ethics doesn’t exist at pres- ent. (To read PCMA’s Principles of Professional and Ethical Conduct, visitwww.pcma.org/documents/code_of_ethics .pdf.) “Some people would argue that we are a profession, and all professions have codes of ethics; so therefore we should


pcmaconvene October 2010 65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108