This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
36


Contact | Mar 12 News


MEMBERSHIP POLL Can CPD plug the skills gap? Survey says yes


Latest research among CIOB Members shows that 80% feel CPD is an essential ingredient in their career development, particularly with newer issues such as BIM


Almost 80% of construction professionals believe that up-to-date CPD can alleviate skills gaps in the industry, according to a CIOB survey on current CPD provision which attracted more than 1,500 respondents. “Professional bodies have long been the ambassadors for CPD; it’s what sets a professional qualification apart from an academic one and certainly within our membership there is a real appetite and culture of CPD. It could be argued that the role of CPD has been undervalued,” said Michael Brown, deputy chief executive at the CIOB. “But if we look at topics like the rise of Building Information Modelling combined with the shortfall of industry training funds then it might well be left to CPD providers to plug the skills gap,” he added. Eight out of 10 respondents felt that CPD was


an important, very important or essential ingredient for their career development, with 46% seeing an improvement in their own performance as a result of CPD. For 44% of respondents, CPD had improved their ability to cope with change. In the past 12 months 30% of respondents said taking part in CPD had improved their own employability and just under half suggested that their employers had remained committed to providing and/ or supporting CPD during 2011. The vast majority – 80% – felt that CPD can


improve the technical knowledge of construction graduates, bridging the gap between academic qualifications and work ready skills. Asked whether respondents valued CPD at the


same level as the previous year (2010) the majority (70%) regarded it of the same importance (important/


very important/essential), with a further 17% suggesting it had become more important. “From what we see in this survey there is an


increasing trend towards online CPD provision rather than the more traditional formal training methods,” said Brown. “That won’t come as a surprise for most of us; the convenience of distance learning is an attractive proposition. “What we have to be mindful of, as we have to with all education and training programmes, is that the CPD on offer is actually valuable and relevant and not just a money making machine. We can’t expect to tackle the big issues with poorly conceived training,” Brown concluded.


A full copy of the survey results can be found at www.ciob.org.uk/resources/research


Scrapping BREEAM for schools is a mistake, says Institute


The CIOB is backing a campaign, which has been launched by the UK Green Building Council and Aldersgate Group, to retain the


BREEAM requirement in schools construction. The Department for Education


is proposing the scrapping of BREEAM requirements for new and


refurbished schools as part of its drive to streamline procurement and reduce costs in the process, outlined last year in the James Review. Alan Crane, CIOB President


(pictured left), stated: “This is a misguided move that contradicts the coalition’s statement that they aim to be the ‘greenest government ever’. Crane continued: “Designing,


building and operating to BREEAM standards yields hugely beneficial energy savings for minimal capital cost, reducing both operational expenditure and carbon emissions.” Meanwhile, the UK-GBC and Aldersgate Group stated: “We think this is incredibly short-sighted. BREEAM, like all standards/tools, may not be perfect, but to scrap its use entirely would have deeply


concerning implications not just for the quality of the nation’s schools, but for the construction and property sector more widely.”


The CIOB is serious about reducing carbon from the built environment, having recently launched its free, interactive online action plan CarbonAction2050.com. Visit www.carbonaction2050.com/ toolkit for more information


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52