This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Construction Professional

On April 1, under powers ushered in by the Construction Act 2011, councils are being handed control over their housing assets and finances. Denise Chevin reports

Coming to a town hall near you — cash

A QUIET REVOLUTION is about to take place across 171 local authorities which could usher in much-needed opportunities for the construction sector. From April, councils that still retain their council housing — including those that have set up arm’s length management organisations, or ALMOs — will be granted control over their housing assets and finances for the first time in decades. It means they will be able to keep all the rental income they get from tenants and decide how to spend it. These changes to the so-called Housing

Revenue Account (HRA), coupled with newfound borrowing powers, could be used to build new homes or revamp existing stock. Under the current system some councils have to pay a proportion of their income to the government through an annual settlement, which is then redistributed, meaning that there has been no financial incentive for managing stock efficiently. In effect, the reform of the HRA creates 171 new businesses, which will be run more along housing

association lines. Steve Trusler, director of strategy at

Wates Living Space, says: “The reform of the HRA is one of the few chinks of light out there at the moment in terms of opportunities. “The one area I have concern over is about timing. It’s such a massive change legally and accounting-wise — there’s a big issue around skills. Some local authorities are really on the ball in terms of their business plans, others aren’t.” “No one is really sure how long the new

system will take to get up and running, and if anything, we may see a hiatus in terms of funding and spending.” Ian Doolittle, a partner specialising in public sector housing at legal firm Trowers & Hamlins, agrees: “There is certainly a brave new age dawning on 1 April. But it will take time to exploit the new freedoms.” A study by PricewaterhouseCoopers

last year revealed that councils would be expected to generate more than £300bn of rental income over the next 30 years.

Back to basics: Consequential losses

If a contractor breaches a contract, the general rule is that the employer can recover damages in two ways: either for losses that a reasonable person would expect the relevant breach to produce (direct losses), or for any other losses that the parties, at the time they made the contract, would reasonably expect to result from the breach (consequential losses).

20 | MARCH 2012 | CONSTRUCTION MANAGER If a contractor builds a hotel and

breaches the contract by not completing the works in accordance with the contract, the rectification costs incurred by the employer would be a “direct loss”. If the breach of contract delays the opening of the hotel, the employer is also likely to have a viable loss of profits claim — a “consequential loss”. Contractors often seek to limit their

liability for consequential losses. Many of the standard form building contracts (for example some of the JCT Design and Build and NEC forms) contain provisions that seek to limit liability. But contractors should be wary of the following: n a consequential loss provision can always be challenged, so a court might find that the loss suffered is a “direct

“It’s such a massive change legally and accounting-wise. Some local authorities are really on the ball in terms of their business plans, others aren’t.” Steve Trusler, Wates Living Space

What the top 25 councils can borrow (£m) 1 Lambeth


2 Southwark 123.7 3 Tower hamlets 111.7 4 Hackney

5 Newham 81.9 6 Camden

7 Wandsworth 67.4 8 Islington 9 Brent

10 Haringey 11 Sandwell

85.4 77.9 60.3

58.9 54.7 53.0

12 Manchester 46.1 13 Ealing


Trowers & Hamlins emphasizes that because a local authority can borrow to these limits, it does not mean that it will

Source: Trowers & Hamlins

14 Lewisham 43.7 15 Nottingham 43.4 16 Sheffield 17 Barnet 18 Enfield

41.0 38.7 38.4

19 Hillingdon 38.1 20 Hammersmith 37.2 21 Westminster 36.3 22 Portsmouth 36.2 23 Wigan

24 Norwich

35.5 35.2

25 Redbridge 33.9

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52