This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Renewable energy


Coal Fired Plants (A) Existing US Plants (B) Coal Comb.C n=46% (B) Coal n=43%


(B) Lignite Comb.C n=48% (B) Lignite n=40% (C) Hard Coal 800 MW (C) Hard Coal Postcom. CCS (C) Lignite Oxyfuel CCS


Natural Gas Fired Plants (A) Existing US Plants (B) Natural Gas n=58% (C) Natural Gas Comb.C (C) Natural Gas Postcom.CCS


Renewable Energy (B) Solar Thermal (B) Geothermal


(B) Wind 2.5 MW Offshore (B) Wind 1.5 MW Onshore (C) Wind Offshore (B) Hydro 300 kW (B) PV (2030) (B) PV (2000)


(C) PV Southern Europe (C) Biomass CHP 6 MWel


(D) Biomass Grate Boiler ESP 5 and 10 MW Fuel


0.01 0.1 1 10 External Costs [US$ cent/kWh]


Figure 5: External costs of energy sources related to global health and climate change (logarithmic scale) Source: IPCC (2011)


with those issues separately (IPCC 2007), strengthening the argument for taking measures to control air pollution.


The size of the externalities calculations indicates that various renewable technologies would already be competitive if important external costs were internalised to producers and consumers, but are primarily illustrative as there are acknowledged uncertainties in climate-change modelling and the calculation of the resulting damage costs. Because these external costs are not adequately reflected in energy prices, consumers, producers and decision-makers do not receive accurate price signals that are necessary to reach decisions about how best to use resources.


Governments should, though, consider these externalities in formulating policy and strategy for the energy sector. Table 6 by the European Commission (2008) is an example of how


18. Note that steam cycle power plants require a reliable supply of water that in many areas is an increasingly valuable commodity subject to competing uses.


Hence the analysis presented in Table 6 makes


conservative assumptions concerning production costs of electricity from fossil fuels.


19. The Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (2007) reviewed damage cost estimates in peer-reviewed literature at the time of preparation of the assessment (up to 2005), reporting an average of US$ 12 per tonne of CO2, and an upper bound at US$ 95 per tonne of CO2. As discussed below, a more recent review by the German Aerospace Centre and Fraunhofer Institute for System and Innovation Research (DLR/ISI, 2006) proposed a much higher range of € 15-280 per tonne of CO2, based primarily on a modelling report for the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).


incorporating the external costs of CO2 emissions, together


with expected cost reductions for various technologies can alter the competitiveness, in economic terms, of renewable energy technologies in the EU. The table, providing a range of estimates for various technologies, under a moderate fuel-price scenario illustrates how some sources of renewable electricity – in particular hydro and wind – can compete with fossil fuels and nuclear technologies in the EU. It also shows that in the EU the production cost of electricity from on-shore wind could soon be competitive with natural gas technologies. For biomass in the EU, the wide range reflects uncertainties in the costs of biomass. Costs of other renewable energy technologies, namely those for which only prototypes presently exist, are still significantly higher than conventional technologies.18 The cost of electricity generated in the EU by solar PV is projected to fall by around a factor of three by 2030, but it is expected to remain considerably more expensive than that generated by other sources.


Table 6 also illustrates the important role played by the carbon price in assessing the cost-competitiveness of renewable energy generation compared with that derived from fossil fuels. The scenarios assume that each tonne of CO2 € 0/ tCO2


in 2007, € 41/tCO2


directly emitted attracts a levy of in 2020 and € 47/tCO2


in


2030. This assumes a relatively steep rise compared with the current (2011) levels of € 10-15, highlighting the potential of carbon markets (see Box 1).19


If the 215


Health Climate Change


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43