This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS I ROUNDUP Price collapse stimulates US PV market


DESPITE a struggling domestic economy, the US solar photovoltaic (PV) market will double in 2011, according to the latest Solarbuzz United States PV Report. 2011 growth rates vary by market segment, an outcome of the movements in incentives and policies over the past 12 months.


“With rapid declines in factory gate prices over the past eight weeks as manufacturers and distributors focus on depleting module inventories, demand has picked up across residential, corporate and government segments,” noted Craig Stevens, President of Solarbuzz. “This acceleration is being supplemented by explosive utility demand and the rush to install before federal cash grants are scheduled to expire at the end of the year.”


The US is forecast to become the third- largest solar photovoltaic market, behind Germany and Italy in 2011. While the US currently comprises 5% of the world PV market, Solarbuzz projects an increase to 12% by 2015. US growth in solar has been supported by a combination of incentives and policies instituted at the federal, state and local levels. At the federal level, the Investment Tax Credit and the Treasury Cash Grants continue to play an role in stimulating investments in the PV industry. At the state level, among various policies, Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) are driving the expansion of the utilities segment, which increased from 17% of the on-grid PV market in 2009 to 31% in 2010.


In 2010, California dominated the market, however, the state’s share dropped to 30% from 50% in 2009. The state recently increased its RPS to 33%, positioning California for dominance in the US PV market. Following California were New Jersey, Arizona and Colorado. Newcomers to the state top 10 list in 2010 included Nevada, Pennsylvania and New Mexico. In fact, the largest PV project in the country to date, the 48 MW- AC Copper Mountain Solar Project, was built in Nevada in 2010, and the second- largest PV project, the 30 MW-AC Cimarron Solar, is in New Mexico.


Most of the states in the top 10 list incorporated drivers such as state RPS and compliance methods that influenced the dynamics and deployment of the


Issue VIII 2011 I www.solar-pv-management.com 11


market segment in each state. For example, Colorado demonstrated a relatively balanced market mix due to the available REC purchase incentives for residential and non-residential PV systems as well as utility RFQs for large systems. The non-residential PV segment dominated in New Jersey due to the prevalent SREC financing.


Utility demand will continue to rise, accounting for close to 60% of the 2015 US on-grid PV market mix in the most aggressive Solarbuzz forecast scenario. Demand for the utility segment has been driven strongly by state RPS, in which state laws require electric utilities to use renewable energy in their portfolio of electricity sources by a deadline.


During 2010, the utility segment started to cause restricting of downstream channels, and developers started to take some of the share from conventional PV integrators. The report also indicates a shift in market share for module


manufacturers during 2010, with China- headquartered manufacturers growing their share from 11% in 2009 to 37% in 2010. This rising presence of Chinese manufacturers encouraged direct sales between those manufacturers and system integrators as well as solar lease providers working in concert with system integrators.


Not only was utility segment demand strong in 2010, but the strength of the project pipeline in the US confirms that its market share is likely to increase over the next few years.


Within the next five years, Solarbuzz forecasts the market will grow to 6.4 GW depending on the scenario, representing a CAGR of up to 47%. The extension of the Treasury Cash Grant will be critical to keep fueling demand in the non- residential and utility segments. Without the extension, less capital will be available for large PV projects held back by a limited tax equity capability.


2011 On-Grid Market Segment Forecast


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88