Intelligence | Practice
93
SALARY SURVEY
Earnings are down again, though a dive in benefits is seeing some stabilise. Aziz Mirza discusses this year’s RIBA/The Fees Bureau Architects Employment & Earnings Survey
SALARIES SHOW SIGNS OF EASING
THIS IS the first time the RIBA/The Fees Bureau Architects Employment & Earnings Survey, which started in 1987, has recorded salary falls for two consecutive years. Its main findings are: > Architects’ average earnings on 1 April 2011: £40,000
> Change in average earnings 2010 to 2011: 3 per cent fall
> Biggest fall is in the earnings of architects in the public sector
> A quarter of sole principals earn less than £20,000
> Average earnings of sole principals and salaried private practice architects has stabilised after falling last year
> Unemployed: 4 per cent; Not working for other reasons: 3 per cent – both unchanged from last year The survey shows average earnings have
fallen further in 2011. After last year’s precipitous 8 per cent fall, the drop this year is 3 per cent. So while the rate of decline has slowed, this year’s falls compound those recorded last year. As a result, the
profession’s average earnings are now back in cash terms to where they were in 2007. Factor in inflation, and average earnings in ‘real’ terms are at the level they were in 2000. This is only the fourth time since the survey
started in the mid 1980s that earnings have fallen. But it is also one of the largest falls; not as big as last year’s but more substantial than in 1992 (2 per cent drop) or 1994 (1 per cent). And since earnings rose in 1993 this is the first to record consecutive year on year falls. Again, after factoring in inflation, this brings 2011’s fall to 11 per cent in real terms. This real-money fall is second only to last year’s. Taking inflation into account, average earnings of the profession have fallen back by 20 per cent in the last two years.
Some good news That’s the worst of it over: there are some nuggets of good news. The largest single area of employment, salaried architects working in private practice, saw average earnings stabilise in 2011. This comes after a 6 per cent
TABLE 1: ARCHITECTS’ EARNINGS BY FIELD OF EMPLOYMENT, 2011 AND 2010 Employment field (£)
2010 Sole principals
Principals in partnership ALL PRINCIPALS
Private practice salaried Private in-house Local authorities
Central government ALL SALARIED TOTAL
Base: All full-time architects RIBA JOURNAL : SEPTEMBER 2011
Lower quartile Median 21,250
36,000 30,000 33,000 44,250 38,338 43,250 34,000 33,350
35,000 50,250 46,000 38,000 54,000 42,000 48,500 40,000 41,416
72,000 66,200 44,000 72,750 50,000 55,000 48,000 55,000
20,000 35,000 30,000 32,780 44,663 35,000 39,250 34,000 32,500
fall last year. And looking within the data, we see that average salaries paid to employees in medium and large practices have increased. For example, average salaries are 3 per cent higher in practices that have 6-10, 11-30 and 31-50 architectural staff, although they are just 1 per cent higher in those with over 50. This trend is not echoed among partners and directors in the 6-10 or 11- 30 size groups – their average earnings have fallen while they pay their staff more. There is also good news for sole principals
– average earnings have stopped falling. This comes after a 13 per cent drop last year and an 11 per cent decline the year before. A note of caution, however: the lower quartile earnings of sole principals has dropped this year, meaning that a quarter earn £20,000 or less. This might reflect the continuing rise in the number of architects who are sole principals. Architects working for private in-house departments recorded a 2 per cent increase this year after last year’s fall. This continues to be the best paid sector in the profession. This year’s largest falls are recorded by
public sector architects. Those working for local authorities saw a decline of 7 per cent, while salaries for their colleagues in central government fell by 4 per cent. These reverse last year’s rises. As if falling earnings were not bad enough,
the provision of fringe benefits has continued to decline too, after last year’s survey showed fewer architects receiving benefits such as contributory pensions or company cars. In some areas the fall has been dramatic. The proportion of architects receiving a
2011
Upper quartile Lower quartile Median 50,000
35,000 49,225 44,250 38,000 55,000 39,000 46,700 40,000 40,000
50,000 70,000 65,000 45,000 75,000 47,000 55,973 49,000 55,000
2010-2011
Upper quartile Change of median 0%
-2% -4% 0%
+2% -7% -4% 0%
-3%
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117