This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
44


Analysis | Olympics | Aquatics Centre


BELOW LEFT: For the competitors the space is going to feel like a panopticon, the whole area visible at once. This is not the case for the audience, however, some of whom will not see 7,000 other spectators.


BELOW: The boards make simultaneous reference to constructivism and Hadid’s deconstructivism.


against the curves of both the roof and the walls of the sunken pool area. Geometries crash together visually, generating the spatial drama that a more considered and measured approach might not have yielded. But beyond this it is problematic: sight lines are such that, from the upper levels, the pool can only be viewed through a slit of space between the roof profile and the bottom of the raked seating. The reduced spectator requirement for diving means the diving boards are not visible from the upper tiers. This all might, as Heverin rationalised, concentrate the eye on the actual competition, but as a result, it’s on little else. But one thing’s for sure, with all relation to the outside world severed for the duration of the games, the effect on the competitor, with 18,000 eyes on you, is going to be palpable. Externally, there’s no denying the awkward


nature of the PVC fabric-clad wings either side of the main pool roof, one of which even overhangs a waterway at one corner. If anything they serve to highlight the sophistication of the main roof, dramatically picked out against it. But there’s no doubting that they have been the dealbreaker for the lingering aerial shots of the park during the games, that one feels are going


to concentrate more on slow fly-bys of the suave, understated velodrome than something that looks like it inflated its lifebelt before it left the aircraft. The same cannot be said for the Aquatics


Centre in legacy mode, but the feeling is that the change in the nature of the building will be of biblical proportions. With the stands replaced by leaning glazed walls to the east and west of the pool, the building’s relationship to the landscape will alter fundamentally; and the timber soffit,rather lost in the glare of the high definition lighting for the event, will be cosseted in natural light. The pool, now lost in the bowels of the earth, will be cupped by the berm walls that circle it. You can imagine that swimming in the late afternoon with west light pouring in will be like some kind of cathartic experience – it may even be too much. Hadid’s Aquatics Centre in games mode,


compromised by budgetary constraints, is a flawed but human building. And its temporary wings raise issues about the very nature of spectacle itself. Is it enough for some people to hear the roar of 7,000 other spectators, but not to see them? Could their visual absence negate the dramatic value of the event? Asked the


‘ With the stands replaced in legacy mode by leaning glazed walls to the east and west of the pool, the relationship of the building to the landscape will alter fundamentally’


question, Hadid looks pensive and admits this has been a consideration, though she concedes that even she won’t be able to describe the nature of the experience until it actually occurs in 2012. But maybe it is this experience, and one’s expectations of it, that through the whole process has been unconsciously embedded in the building’s design. And which through its post-games conversion will, like Jonah, cross polarities from introspection to extroversion. Either way, in both modes, my feeling is that the Aquatics Centre will be both flawed enough and assured enough to lead us all to revelations. n


WWW.RIBAJOURNAL.COM : SEPTEMBER 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117