This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
37


Page 40


Page 80


When London won the bid to host the 2012 Olympics it looked like it was more about taking part than winning awards. But the way London created the venues and athletes’ village has set the stage for sporting success


Words Hugh Pearman | Main image Populous


READY, STEADY...


I WAS ONE OF THE NAYSAYERS when they made the surprise announcement, back in 2005, that London was to host the 2012 Olympics. And remember, it WAS a surprise – few seriously expected London to win despite all the brave talk. I’d assumed that Paris would get the nod, and so much the better. This was in the aftermath of the saga of the building of Wembley Stadium, and it was easy to imagine that chapter of accidents scaled up. Besides, nobody could trump what Beijing was preparing for 2008. Meanwhile the centrist French were used to their grands projets, would deliver the Olympics without undue fuss, while we Brits would be spared the embarrassment and expense of fouling up yet another big national construction project which would anyway be a security nightmare. All we would have to do, if we cared tuppence about the Olympics anyway, was let the Eurostar take the strain. The day after the announcement, the horrific London underground bombings of 7/7 happened and it seemed that our worst fears were already being realised. Now here we are, and I was wrong. The design and construction


programme of the venues has been close to exemplary. Of course, there have been glitches and cost escalation but, in the overall scheme of things, not too bad. A full year before the event was due to begin, all the major venues and most of the minor ones were complete, with test events taking place (compare that with the last-minute shambles of the Athens Olympics of 2004). A swathe of post-industrial east London has been transformed and a viable future for the venues established. London has paid more attention to temporary structures (for instance basketball and water polo) and shrinkable ones (the Aquatics Centre, the main stadium) than any previous host city. We have also invested far more in the ‘legacy mode’ for the site, not least the permanent park that will result. A network of waterways has been revived, an excellent landscape plan has been put into effect in good time


LEFT: The field of dreams takes shape. View of the Olympic site looking north.


RIBA JOURNAL : SEPTEMBER 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117