This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CDS technology and a 30% foundry return as shown in Ta- ble 9. The point B is well below the liquidus temperature, TL1


, predicting a good CDS process and a non-dendritic morphology of the primary phase in the as-cast microstruc- ture as confirmed by Figure 24(a).


, used for the CDS process for the three schemes in Table 10 are 7.5, 8.6 and 10, respectively. The only variable for an industry adopting to cast this alloy by CDS will be the alloy composition the parent ingot used to make Alloy 1 melt as shown by the notation “Ingot 1” in Table 10.


Examples of alloy design for CDS casting of 7075 by tilt- pour casting process with recycling schemes for foundry returns is presented in Table 10. In Table 10, three possible scenarios are presented, wherein 20%, 30% and 40% by weight of Alloy 1 are made from foundry returns from the castings of Alloy 3 (7075). In each case, the composition of Alloy 1, Alloy 2 and Alloy 3 are the same. The mass ratios, mr


Figure 26 shows a typical microstructure for Alloy 7075 cast with CDS technology (Figure 26a) and conventional technology with a 60C (108F) melt superheat for the alloy (Figure 26b). The CDS process was carried out with Alloy 1 having 30% by weight foundry returns from Alloy 3 (7075) castings. Figure 26(a) shows that the CDS process yields a non-dendritic morphology of the primary phase in the mi- crostructure whereas the morphology of the conventional cast 7075 sample in Figure 26(b) has a dendritic morphology of the primary Al phase.


Figure 27 shows typical thermal data obtained from the pour- ing cup during the tilt-pour casting of Alloy 7075 with CDS technology and a 30% foundry returns recycling scheme as shown in Table 10. Point B is well below the liquidus temperature, TL1


predicting a good CDS process and a non- dendritic morphology of the primary phase in the as-cast mi- crostructure as confirmed by Figure 26.


Table 9. CDS Process Alloy Compositions of 2024 Al Wrought Alloy with 3 Foundry Return Recycling Schemes


60


International Journal of Metalcasting/Spring 11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88