Results
Grain Size and fading AZ91E
An optical micrograph of the base AZ91E alloy is shown in Figure 2. The grain size was measured over 100 grains using the linear intercept method. The average grain size for AZ91E without any grain refiner addition was 1000 µm. There were no columnar grains at the edges of the casting because the molds were heated above the pouring tempera- ture of the melt. Consequently, solidification proceeded evenly in all directions.
AZ91E + Al-5Ti-1B
After a holding time of five minutes, the addition of 0.1 wt.% Al-5Ti-1B grain refiner provided a significant reduc- tion in grain size from 1000 to 323 µm. Figure 3A depicts the change in microstructure with increasing holding time. The small grain size was maintained with increasing holding time. The optical micrographs for the other addition levels are in Figures 3B-3D. Addition levels of 0.1 and 0.2 wt.% provided the largest degree of grain refinement with very little signs of fading, while addition levels of 0.5 and 1.0 wt.% had grain sizes comparable to the unrefined alloy after 20 minutes of holding.
A quantitative summary of the grain size measurements is shown in Figure 4. Previous crystallographic work8,9
Figure 4. Influence of Al-5Ti-1B addition levels and holding time on the grain size of AZ91E.
nucleating sites in Mg alloys. In addition, Wang et al.10 and Liu et al.12
determined that TiB2
for nucleation at longer holding times. AZ91E + Al-1Ti-3B
the bottom of the less dense (1.74 g/cm3 Mg melt. Therefore, fewer TiB2
of grains. If a similar scenario is occurring for the cur- rent study then the fading of the grain refiner could be explained by density differences between the Mg and the grain refiner. For each pour, the liquid metal was ladled from the top of the crucible. As time progressed, the dens- er TiB2
observed TiB2 particles (4.38 g/cm3 , 0.16 lb/in3
) likely sunk to , 0.0629 lb/in3
)1 particles were available
particles could act as heterogeneous particles within the center
As shown in Figure 5, significant grain refinement was observed while using the Al-1Ti-3B grain refiner. The
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 5. Optical micrographs of AZ91E + Al-1TI-3B castings with increasing holding time (a) 0.1 wt.% Al-1Ti-3B (b) 0.2 wt.% Al-1Ti-3B (c) 0.5 wt.% Al-1Ti-3B (d) 1.0 wt.% Al-1Ti-3B.
International Journal of Metalcasting/Spring 11 33
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88