This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
A widely-accepted definition of sustainable development is the definition given in Chapter 2 of the 1987 Brundtland Report: “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs .” The report points out two key concepts in this definition: the concept of needs and the concept of limitations on the environment’s ability to meet those needs.


The needs for food are increasing as world population grows, but land area for growing crops is finite. There is competition for this land from industrial and residential development, conservation of biodiversity, leisure, and other uses of land such as production of fibres, and building materials and mined materials. We need to supply more food to meet the needs of our increasing population, and also ensure that we minimise the limitations on the environment’s ability to meet future needs. To meet the future needs there must be enough land, a suitable climate, enough water to supply crops and livestock, soils that are sufficiently productive, and technologies that ensure sufficient and reliable yields.


Global warming will make this a more difficult challenge because it will significantly alter the type of crops we produce and where, so it is difficult to predict how future generations will meet their food needs. There is a consensus view that temperate climates such as ours will need to become more productive, because Mediterranean and tropical climates are likely to become less productive.


Increasing efficiency To supply enough food, production will need to be efficient, and waste must be minimised by more efficient supply chains. Fortunately, the drive towards more sustainable food supply, which seeks to drive down environmental impacts such as global warming potential, or carbon footprint, also reduces costs. This is because a greater level of production per unit of land and per unit of inputs (such as fertilisers and fuel) leads to less environmental impact per unit of production.


An ADAS report for the Government’s chief scientific advisor Professor John Beddington showed that it is hypothetically possible to boost wheat production by 40 per cent and oilseed rape production by 55 per cent within the next six to seven years. Such gains would mostly be brought about by bringing grassland and un-cropped areas into production. Yet such a move would have serious drawbacks: large impacts on biodiversity and large carbon


|148| ENVIRONMENT INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


Engagement of suppliers in management of carbon emissions will enhance food security


Dr Jeremy Wiltshire, Head of Carbon Management, ADAS Prof. Roger Sylvester-Bradley, Principal Crop Scientist, ADAS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180