ADVANCED TREATMENT
remain very compact, with low membrane area and moderate membrane replacement costs. Plants also operate on a direct link to level in the bioreactor, automatically adjusting membrane permeate production (and energy use) to suit the inlet flow conditions. AMBR LE is particularly suited to applications with inconsistent or variable wastewater flows, high peak or seasonal loads, or when electricity costs are moderate to high.
3. BIOVERT – Incorporates vertically mounted modules and uses air injection to further reduce energy consumption. This process allows for medium MLSS concentrations and is aimed at higher flows and low to medium strength (i.e. mainly larger municipal applications). Plants are compact, with vertically mounted membrane modules and have more installed membrane area. Plants operate on a more constant level in the bioreactor, with controlled air injection at either the top, or the bottom, of the membrane tubes. Air scour and turbulence reduces surface fouling and energy use is very low. BIOVERT plants are particularly suited to applications with large consistent wastewater flows and when electricity costs are high.
Operations input is low for factory personnel thanks to Aquabio‘s proprietary control software and remote real time monitoring is a standard feature using internet links. All plants have automatic operation including, flushing, backflushing, cleaning, start up and shutdown on demand (see table 1).
Case Study: Kanes Foods, Evesham In 2001 Kanes Foods in Evesham installed an Aquabio ‘first generation’ AMBR plant combined with reverse osmosis (RO) and UV disinfection for wastewater reuse at potable water standards. On the initiative of the company’s owner, John Randall, and extensive trial work over the preceding 18 months, this became the first food plant in Europe to recycle treated wastewater on a large scale producing high quality, potable water. Due to factory growth and continuing limitations on water supply and discharge options, Kanes have recently installed a second AMBR LE plant on the same site to increase the treatment capacity and recycle volume. The 2001 first generation AMBR process treatment scheme comprises upstream screening, flow balancing, dissolved air flotation (DAF) treatment for fine vegetable solids removal, the AMBR itself and downstream treatment by RO, followed by UV disinfection. This process yields potable quality water suitable for blending with mains water for use within the factory. The process comprises
Table 2: Design basis for the plants at Kanes Foods with 1000mg/l COD concentration Parameter
Original plant (Ml/d)
Volume to screening/ balancing Volume to DAF system Volume to MBR process Volume to RO system
Volume of potable quality water for re-use Original plant
1.200 0.815 0.815 0.815 0.650
New plant (Ml/d)
2.250 1.435 1.435 0.858 0.600
Table 3: Summary of process treatment schemes, Kanes Foods Process stage
New plant
Preliminary screening Balancing
DAF treatment
Secondary screening Biological treatment
Reverse osmosis UV disinfection Sludge handling
Old screen now redundant 0.5mm backflushing filter/screen Two 250m3 bioreactors c/w jet mixing/aeration
UF membrane separation Four membrane banks, 34m3/h 27m3/h system 27m3/h unit 22m3 tank
two 250m3 bioreactors with four banks of crossflow membrane modules. The maximum MLSS concentration employed has been as high as 22g/l, but the bioreactor is generally operated at around 10g/l. Sludge production is calculated as being 0.14kg DS/kg COD removed at a sludge age of over 100 days. Each membrane bank (figure 1) comprises four UF membranes, which operate at an average flux of 153l permeate production/m2 membrane area (LMH) normalised to 25°C. The permeate water has average TSS, BOD and COD concentrations of only 4, 7 and 16mg/l respectively. The UF permeate then passes to a two-stage RO plant which achieves an overall recovery of 75%. The reject stream is discharged to sewer and the permeate, which typically has a conductivity of 40–100 µS/cm, is passed to the UV disinfection unit and on to the client’s water supply tank.
Existing plant
The original plant has now been in continuous operation for nine years and has performed consistently in terms of biological treatment, membrane performance and final reuse water quality. Mostly membrane performance has been better than design allowing one bank to be maintained as a standby and so offering more process flexibility and lower energy use. Occasional reductions in membrane flux have been linked to poor biomass health which has been rectified by closer management of the process.
Due to production expansion and the demand on incoming water supply and discharge consent, a second wastewater treatment plant was constructed by Aquabio and commissioned in February. This plant provides an additional 1.435Ml/d of biological/MBR treatment capacity and an additional 0.6Ml/d of reuse water (see
0.7mm rotary drum screen, 220m3/h
900m3 balance tank now used for outlet balancing 1640m3 balance tank c/w mixing/aeration 50m3/h system
60m3/h system 0.25mm rotary drum screen, 80m3/h
One 765m3 bioreactor c/w slot mixing/aeration Four membrane banks, 60m3/h 25m3/h system 25m3/h unit 50m3 tank
table 2). The plant replicates the successful process scheme of the existing plant (see table 3) but utilises Aquabio’s AMBR LE technology to provide significant energy savings compared to the original plant. New common inlet screening and flow balancing facilities are provided, which allows the original balance tank to be used to balance outgoing flows to sewer.
Again, DAF treatment is employed to remove fine vegetable solids prior to the AMBR LE system. A single bioreactor of 765m3, allowing for MLSS concentrations up to 12g/l, is aerated by a blower assisted slot type aeration system, with high alpha factor characteristics.
The AMBR LE UF membrane system comprises four banks of 4m long membranes. Low energy performance is achieved by the use of backflushing to control membrane fouling thus allowing much reduced cross flow velocities and hence significantly lower energy use. The combination of backflushing frequency and variable cross flow velocity is optimised to give the lowest energy use for the required throughput. Significant process flexibility is offered by the inclusion of variable speed recirculation pumps and optional permeate pumping to control the membrane trans- membrane pressure (TMP) and hence the flux performance.
Stable performance is being achieved at an energy use of 0.3-0.5kWh/m3 of treated permeate for the biomass separation, a significant improvement on the original plant. By the end of March 2010 both Aquabio plants had recycled 1.68B litres of potable quality water back into the factory since their start up. Additional quantities of AMBR permeate water have also been reused in non potable duties. nnn
www.aquabio.co.uk December 2010 Water & Wastewater Treatment 25 Combined (Ml/d)
2.250 2.250 2.250 1.673 1.250
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44