68 HEALTH & SAFETY
Oil characterisation is key to preventing hydrate formation
Research carried out in Norway promises to bring new solutions to the problem of dealing with hydrate formation in pipelines. Sean Ottewell reports.
Los estudios realizados en Noruega prometen encontrar nuevas
soluciones al problema de la formación de hidratos en las tuberías. Sean Ottewell informa.
Eine in Norwegen durchgeführte Forschung macht neue Lösungen für das Problem der Hydratbildung in Pipelines möglich. Ein Bericht von Sean Ottewell.
O
perators of subsea fields on the continental shelf spend huge sums on combating insidious ice- like crystals known as hydrates.
However, the formation of hydrates is like a big chemical jigsaw puzzle that is only slowly being pieced together. Now scientists at SINTEF, the largest independent research organisation in Scandinavia, believe that they have made a major breakthough in the puzzle - a move that is already attracting attention from one of the world’s biggest oil companies.
“If all the pieces fall into place, they will
help to reduce the currently high costs of preventing hydrates from forming in pipelines,” says senior scientist Sylvi Høiland in the Bergen office of SINTEF Petroleum Research.
Financial support
Høiland leads the Hyades hydrates project which receives financial support from the Research Council of Norway, and in which SINTEF has been joined by the University of Bergen, StatoilHydro’s Research Centre in Bergen and the US oil company Chevron. The project continues a long-lasting cooperation between the Department of Chemistry at the University of Bergen and Norsk Hydro - an effort that began on a small scale but which has gradually increased in scale as the international interest has grown. The results of the project have recently won praise from Shell, one of the petroleum industry’s largest companies. The backcloth to the project is oil and gas
production from subsea fields, from which the well-flow is brought to nearby platforms or ashore by pipeline, nowadays over even longer distances. This is not always an easy matter. The trouble is that wells seldom produce
only pure oil or pure gas. Well-flows are usually a mixture of oil, natural gas and water. In the pipelines that carry such mixtures
across the seabed, the gas and water form hydrates if the temperature is low enough. And it can be cold when pipeline transport takes place over long distances under water, as the cold water at the bottom of the sea cools the mixture inside the pipeline.
www.engineerlive.com Likewise, when maintenance operations or
other circumstances mean that production has to be shut down for a while, the temperature inside the pipe may fall so far that it offers ideal conditions for hydrate formation. And some of the hydrate crystals that form are worse than others (Fig. 1).
Snow-like crystals
Certain hydrates have the property of forming sticky, wet snow-like crystals. These can grow into large plugs that completely block the pipeline. In order to prevent hydrate formation, the oil companies pour large volumes of antifreeze (methanol or glycol) into wells, pipelines and process equipment. Similarly, when planned or unanticipated shutdowns take place, large quantities of antifreeze are added in order to prevent hydrate formation. All of which is extremely expensive. The problem is not only that antifreeze is expensive; shutdowns involve more production downtime, because of the long time needed to pump large quantities of chemicals down the pipeline. And on the shelf, lost time means lost revenues. But now, the scientific puzzle in Bergen has led to the hope that the consumption of chemicals can be reduced in the future. This hope is related to the fact that certain characteristics of some types of oil prevent hydrates turn into sticky snowballs. When such types are present in the pipeline, the hydrates remain in the form of a fine powder that is easily carried through the pipeline. But what are the chemical components of
the problem-free oil that makes it so? That is the key question that the Hyades project scientists are studying.
“Our aim is to end up with a situation in which we can bring a sample of oil into a lab so that a simple analysis will tell us the following: that the hydrates that form in the presence of oil A will block the pipeline, while oil B will not present any problem at all,” says Høiland. Høiland emphasises that the Hyades project on its own will not solve the problem, but that it should take us a step further towards that goal. The international petroleum industry has already taken note of the project.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76