56 PRODUCTION/PROCESSING/HANDLING
Bearing design reduces performance variability
Tight-tolerance tilt pad journal bearings provide increased stability in high speed turbomachinery equipment. Dr. Kenneth R. Bischof reports.
become even greater for rotor-bearing system engineers. Often these challenges are a direct result of a more flexible rotating system and increased rotor length, leading to increased bearing spans. To combat these challenges, fluid film bearing engineers have traditionally relied on a variety of features within a tilt pad journal bearing, such as assembled clearance, pad- angle, pre-load and pivot offset. When traditional feature variations are not sufficient for more challenging systems, bearing structural stiffness and damping have also been improved through the use of higher performing ball-and- socket pivot designs as well as employing squeeze-film dampers, respectively. System rotordynamic challenges have placed an
A
s machinery builders strive for improved efficiency, higher pressure ratios or increased operational flexibility, static performance and rotordynamic challenges
with a hardened steel pivot, offering a solution with reduced pad flutter, particularly in unloaded pads, and less vibration, fatigue and wear. The bearing is also designed with a secondary integral pad stop that prevents over-rotation as well as improved oil distribution across the pads. One of the primary benefits of the single-piece
construction used in combination with the hardened steel pivot design is the significant improvement in bearing and pad bore tolerance. The design eliminates the tolerance stack-up inherent to traditional tilt pad journal bearings and provides a platform where bearing bore machining is the final step in the manufacturing process. Bearing bore tolerances can be held to within 0.0003-in (8 microns), which decreases variability of dynamic performance prediction models, improves machine performance and ultimately reduces variation from machine-to-machine. To date, applications
realising the most benefit Fig. 1. Waukesha’s tight-tolerance tilt pad
journal bearing is designed to reduce bearing dynamic performance variability.
from this unique single- piece frame design have been turbomachinery that require tight tolerances relative to the overall bearing clearance in order to reduce machine variability and control rotordynamics. Specific applications include high speed compressors,
increased emphasis on reliably maintaining tight tolerances within bearing manufacturing processes. Even the slightest tolerance variations can have dramatic impact on bearing stiffness and damping characteristics, ultimately leading to differences between predicted and actual performance of the machine.
Early in 2008 Waukesha Bearings completed development of a new bearing design aimed at solving many of the technical issues surrounding the dynamic performance of the rotor-bearing system. This new design utilises a patent-pending, single-piece frame construction with the tilt pads integral to the shell and without sacrificing pivot stiffness, creating a potential fatigue-failure point or restricting free-tilt of the journal pads. This is accomplished through the use of an EDM manufacturing process used in combination
gearboxes, turbochargers and turboexpanders. Additional application-specific options available in this design are complex bore shapes for rotordynamic benefits and alternative materials such as bearing- grade bronze. For applications requiring combination thrust and journal bearings, this design can be paired with a variety of thrust bearing options. In summary, Waukesha’s tight-tolerance tilt pad
journal bearing is designed to reduce bearing dynamic performance variability, providing increased machine stability. The design achieves high pivot stiffness without sacrificing the benefits associated with freely tilting journal pads. o
Enter 56 or ✔ at
www.engineerlive.com/iog
Dr. Kenneth R. Bischof, Senior Development Engineer, is with Waukesha Bearings, Pewaukee, USA.
www.waukbearing.com
www.engineerlive.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76