search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HSPA VIEWPOINT


SPD and OR Leaders: Don’t Muddle the Huddle


by David L. Taylor, MSN, RN, CNOR Kristina Pirollo-Ketchum, AA, CRCST, CHL Albert Huether, MBA, CRCST


H


ealthcare workers are often faced with high-stress situations that can contribute to negative patient outcomes and costly monetary impact for the healthcare organization. Sterile Processing departments (SPDs) and Operating Rooms (ORs) are two areas that commonly experience these types of situations; therefore, establishing strong interdisciplinary relationships is critical. Although the SPD and OR are unique in the services they provide, they share the same goals for patient safety, infec- tion prevention, and successful outcomes. When one department struggles or suffers, the other does as well. Despite the close working relationship and shared goals, friction and tension are common between the two departments—and SPD and OR leaders must work together to build a strong interdisciplinary alliance that meets the organization’s goals and mission and benefi ts employees, as well as the patients they serve. Leaders who ensure the right staff are involved—with the right skills and processes—are essential when build- ing effective teams.1


Departmental rounding and staff hud- dles are two highly effective tactics leaders can implement to ensure all SPD and OR team members are informed of pertinent information that will keep procedures safe and on schedule.


Collaborating for quality Huddles are important because they allow the two departments to share key infor- mation that will help avoid issues that could cause delays or other negative situa- tions. Information shared during huddles should be two-way, relevant, and objec- tive. When issues arise, pertinent details should be shared, and solutions should be sought together.


SPDs that play a large role in surgery should ideally have the SP leader (or another professional appointed by the


SP leader) meet with surgery at least once daily to review the surgical needs for the day and address any issues or concerns regarding instrumentation or equipment provided by the SPD.2


That information


should then be shared with the rest of the SP professionals to ensure everyone understands the needs and priorities. Rounding is another powerful tool that, when used properly, builds trust and improved understanding between the departments. When SP team members round in surgical suites before the day’s fi rst case and periodically throughout the day, for example, they see fi rsthand the issues the surgical team must overcome to keep their day moving and trouble- shoot issues in real time. Rounding in the OR is a proactive approach to identify- ing and resolving potential problems that may arise during procedures. Having SP team members present in the OR makes it possible to quickly address any concerns related to instrument sterilization, supply availability or equipment functionality. They can see fi rsthand how their work impacts patient care, and how their role ensures that surgical instruments are properly cleaned, assembled, sterilized, stored, and available when needed. In addition to troubleshooting, round- ing in the OR allows both departmental teams to communicate effectively and build better relationships. By working closely together, employees from both departments can develop a deeper mutual understanding of roles and responsibili- ties, which can lead to better collaboration. Rounding also helps ensure all necessary resources are available, which reduces stress for both teams, and improves patient care and surgeon satisfaction. Likewise, when OR staff spend time in


the SPD and become immersed in the com- plex processes of instrument reprocessing, they gain a clearer perspective of the time and resources needed for each step and,


89799929 © Rawpixelimages | Dreamstime.com


often, and greater respect and apprecia- tion for those who perform the job. Being present and listening to concerns


fi rsthand allows SP and OR professionals to ask clarifying questions and respond more proactively instead of reactively. This heightened collaboration strength- ens bonds and helps leaders from both departments to identify process issues, solutions, and opportunities for improve- ment that will positively affect both departments. When healthcare profes- sionals work together, they share their expertise and knowledge, leading to better decision-making.


Conclusion


Effective collaboration between the OR and SP teams is essential for quality patient service. Open and honest com- munication is vital in any healthcare set- ting, especially in these two departments, where time is of the essence and patient safety is a top priority.


Ensuring effective interdisciplinary


teamwork and collaboration can be a complex process; therefore, leaders who ensure the right staff are involved— with the right skills and processes—are essential for building effective teams. By fostering collaboration through cross- departmental staff huddles and round- ing, healthcare organizations can improve patient outcomes, reduce errors, and enhance operational effi ciency. HPN


References


1. Business Bliss Consultants FZE. “Eff ective Team Work in Quality Patient Care.” November 2018. https://ukdiss.com/ examples/quality-patient-care-team-work.php?vref=1


2. HSPA. Central Service Leadership Manual, Third Ed. 2020. hpnonline.com • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • August 2023 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44