search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STANDARD PRACTICES


How COVID-19 can accelerate economic, environmental health


by Karen Conway, Vice President, Healthcare Value, GHX O


ver the past few months, I have faced a seemingly classic question of whether to support the economy or the envi- ronment (although I hope this column will demonstrate how this does not have to be a zero sum game). My current pre- dicament is: I want to support a local family-owned restaurant, but every time I place a “to go” order, I cringe at the amount of plastic and Styrofoam used to deliver the food safely and how plastic use has grown exponentially in the wake of the pandemic. A recent LA Times article1


documented “a dramatic increase in


the use of plastic,” from hand sanitizer bottles to takeout contain- ers. Even Starbucks temporarily stopped allowing customers to bring reusable mugs for fear that they contribute to the spread of the virus (despite assurances from medical experts that they can safely and routinely be sanitized).


COVID-19 has increased the use of plastics-based products in


healthcare, with cities around the world facing dramatic increases in infectious medical waste, including disposable masks, gloves and gowns. Even before the pandemic, healthcare was one of the biggest consumers of plastic.


But there are signs that the pandemic has reinvigorated inter- est in more sustainable medical products. Faced with shortages of disposable isolation gowns, many hospitals are considering purchasing more reusable gowns. A 2018 peer-reviewed study2 looked at the environmental impact of reusable isolation gowns across their lifecycle compared to disposable alternatives. The researchers found that conversion to reusable gowns had signifi - cant environmental benefi ts


28 percent lower natural resource energy consumption 30 percent lower greenhouse gas emissions 41 percent less total (blue) water consumed 93-99 percent lower solid waste generation Even with such evidence, product conversions are not easy. The


on how he managed the switch during similar supply shortages caused by the H1N1 pandemic. Eric Frederick gained buy-in from multiple stakeholders, from infection control to nursing, by solving packaging concerns and developing laundry protocols that improved versus reduced repellency of the gowns. UCLA Health also reports saving more than $1 million dollars and nearly 300 tons of waste since converting to reusable products in November 2015.4


director of linen services at the Carilion Clinic recently republished a two-part article3


about a multiplier effect when jobs, especially in manufacturing, are created, spurring additional economic benefi ts for the com- munity where those jobs are located. The 45 plus health systems participating in the Healthcare Anchor Network (HAN) are work- ing with the Democracy Collaborative and Practice Greenhealth to promote more local hospital purchasing from minority- and women-owned local businesses.


Westside United in Chicago did something similar years ago, bringing together unaffi liated health systems to create a shared laundry service staffed by individuals hired from the local com- munity. uch initiatives take on added signifi cance if you consider the potential for increased demand for laundry services with the switch to more reusable personal protective equipment (PPE). Now, consider how a similar effort might address the need for more domestically produced PPE. What if regional hospitals were to create long-term purchasing commitments that would provide a local manufacturer with the business case necessary to invest in not only production capacity but also take the steps necessary to get U.. ood and rug dministration fi rst  clearance for its products.


During a recent workshop as part of the Association for Health- care Resource and Materials Management (AHRMM) virtual conference, 40 percent of attendees said they partnered with local businesses to address pandemic-related shortages, with nearly 50 percent planning to work with these companies in the future. The ability of those businesses to continue to supply to hospitals after the FDA’s emergency use authorizations expire will require navigating the ins and outs of FDA clearance. Long-term purchas- ing agreements can provide those businesses with the assurance that demand for locally produced, quality products will continue beyond the pandemic. Yes, it takes a village to make this level of change happen, but it can also solve multiple problems – from sup- ply continuity to economic development that generates jobs with insurance coverage and the ability for disadvantaged populations to have access to not only healthcare services, but also the social resources, such as good food, housing and transportation, that contribute to better health overall.


As these stories demonstrate, moving to more environmen- tally sustainable products can also make economic sense. This becomes increasingly signifi cant as we consider how I- has disproportionately impacted low-income populations and communities of color, which suffer from higher rates of obesity, diabetes and hypertension that can increase the severity of COVID-19 infections. The critical supply shortages driven in part by a paucity of domestic production combined with the impact of COVID-19 on disadvantaged neighborhoods present some interesting opportu- nities for community reinvestment. Economists have long spoken


As for the challenge of food delivery, I am encouraged by a Singapore start-up that is piloting food delivery using bamboo boxes that can be returned, washed and sanitized before re-use. Of course, to do that in the U.S. would likely require some regulatory changes, but after all, that’s how villages create new standards for economic and environmental hea lth. HPN


References


1 https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-06-13/coronavirus-pandemic-plastic-waste- recycling 2


Vozzola E, Overcash M, Griffi ng E. Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation


gowns: A life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternatives. American Journal of Infection Control. 2018; 46:881-6.


3 https://americanlaundrynews.com/articles/reusable-barrier-isolation-gown-success-story-part-1; https://americanlaundrynews.com/articles/reusable-barrier-isolation-gown-success-story-part-2


4 https://practicegreenhealth.org/tools-and-resources/ronald-reagan-ucla-medical-center- reusable-isolation-gowns


58 November 2020 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66