search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IAHCSMM VIEWPOINT


Want to improve quality, partnerships? Walk in each other’s shoes


by David Taylor III, MSN, RN, CNOR K


eeping Sterile Processing departments (SPDs) performing optimally and ensuring interdisciplinary relationships remain strong and productive is often challenging, even for the most knowledgeable and experienced SPD leader. One way SPD leaders can improve outcomes, foster better interdisciplinary partnerships and broaden SPD technicians’ experience is to have SPD professionals spend quality time in the various departments they serve. This approach is, of course, in addition to the training, cross training and competency validations SPD leaders already routinely provide in their roles. Such an approach gives SPD employees a clearer view of the big picture when it comes to suc- cessful interventional, procedural and surgical departments – and how their products and services directly impact their interdisciplin- ary customers, and patients.


In my professional career, I’ve personally seen how rotating staff through different departments for up to two weeks at a time gives them a better perspective of what happens behind the scenes. Interventional, procedural and surgical departments are complicated and have many needs and “moving parts.” When high-pressure situations arise in procedural areas and the risks associated with them are mitigated due to prompt, high quality service and attention to detail from SPD professionals, those in the SPD can take pride in knowing their hard work helped prevent a negative outcome – and a new level of trust and respect can start developing between the departments.


Understanding builds collaboration The more professionals from one department understand about another department’s roles, needs and challenges (and how each department’s roles interact and intersect with one another), the easier it is to bridge gaps and improve safety and positive outcomes through collaboration. SPD professionals who directly observe procedures gain new perspective about the instrumentation and equipment they process and provide, as well as the need to have sets that are clean, sterile, well-functioning, error-free, and avail- able on time. They will also gain a better understanding of the frustration a surgeon experiences when an instrument is missing or doesn’t perform properly in the middle of a high-stress procedure. When SPD professionals take time to thoroughly check the quality and functionality of instruments, the end user will experience less frustration. And when SPD professionals are able to see instru- ments in action, they realize the impact they have on every patient.


Conversely, the actions of interventional, procedural or surgical


staff can have a big impact on SPD professionals’ ability to process instruments effectively, effi ciently and safely. ll staff members in those departments should spend ample time in the SPD, keenly observing all that takes place in each of the critical areas of the department. One day spent in decontamination will convince anyone that properly caring for instrumentation during and after a procedure truly matters. Understanding that the cleaning process actually begins at the point of use rather than in the SPD’s decon- tamination areas is essential, as is being knowledgeable about how to apply appropriate enzymatic solutions to the instruments prior to returning those case carts to the SPD. dditionally, when procedural staff are able to see fi rsthand how


diffi cult it can be for their  colleagues to manage process uality and follow standards, guidelines, best practices and instructions for use – all while under time pressures – they will have a far better perspective and appreciation of the work being accomplished every day, seven days a week. When all parties understand the issues each other’s department routinely faces, the greater likelihood the departments will work together toward a better solution.


Conclusion Instruments that are improperly cared for during or after a proce- dure or are misplaced or malfunctioning can result in frustration for the end user and negative outcomes for the patient, facility and all departments involved. When departments work together to build better interdisciplinary relationships and a broader understanding of what takes place within one another’s walls, quality and com- munication will improve, service will be delivered more effectively and effi ciently, and positive outcomes will typically result. SPD leaders (and leaders from the departments they serve) who consistently strive to create a work environment that puts people fi rst and promotes interdisciplinary collaboration will foster greater reliability, safety and accountability. They also help create a team- based environment that can more proactively address challenges and obstacles, mitigate risks and optimize processes and practices – all of which will improve the delivery of safe, effective care and service. HPN


David L. Taylor III, MSN, RN, CNOR, is the principal of Resolute Advi- sory roup  a healthcare consulting fi rm in San ntonio . e has ritten for S since . avidesolutedvisoryroup.com.


Photo credit: xixinxing | stock.adobe.com 46 November 2020 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66