search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Analysis and Opinion


UKRI’s open access policy, one year on Caren Milloy outlines the policy’s impact and the work that made it happen


The launch of UK Research and Innovation’s open access (OA) policy in April 2022 marked an important waypoint on the journey to open access. UKRI’s policy provided a steer for


how publicly funded research should be shared, reused, and built upon for the benefit of wider society. For Jisc, it aligned perfectly with our work with the sector to enable open access to UK research and to save the sector time and money.


Positive policy impact Since the announcement, Jisc has scaled up its activity and is now working with 255 publishers from a broad range of subject areas to negotiate a wide selection of open access publishing routes and to confirm funders’ compliance. The priority has been to ensure society publishers, smaller publishers and university presses are putting in place routes that enable UKRI-funded researchers to publish open access. We want to remove administrative or cost barriers to them, their funders or institutions. We work with these publishers to help them understand which model will work best for them, then help them implement it to ensure their compliance is visible to authors via our Sherpa platform. As a result of the arrangements put in


place by Jisc and publishers, more than 95% of journals that UKRI-funded authors publish in are policy-compliant and eligible for OA funding from UKRI across all disciplines. Since 2022, we have reduced the gap


in compliance between subject areas – especially in the humanities, which now have similar levels of compliance as STEM subjects. In April 2022, the difference between the subjects with the highest and lowest proportions of compliant and eligible, or green compliant, journals was 11%: it is now 7%. With most journals now offering


compliant and eligible routes to open access, our focus is turning to monographs.


The next challenges in OA From 1 January 2024, long-form


www.researchinformation.info | @researchinfo


publications are included in the UKRI policy for the first time. This means that monographs, edited collections, and book chapters will need to be open access within 12 months of publication. This presents an opportunity for the


sector to build its support for diverse and innovative ways of sharing long- form research. We have prioritised community-funded agreements and membership models such as Open Book Publishers. We have negotiated various agreements using the free-to-read, free- to-publish ‘diamond’ publishing model such as the initiative for early career researchers, OpenUp, and Opening the Future. These diamond models act as a much- needed alternative to book processing


‘We have prioritised community-funded agreements and membership models’


charges (BPCs). UK institutions increasingly want to support cultural diversity and inclusivity in academic book publishing, known as bibliodiversity. They also want to control and constrain


costs and broaden participation in open scholarship. It was estimated in a 2017 report published in UKSG Insights that the cost to publish 75% of books submitted to the Research Excellence Framework under the BPC model would be £19.2m per year. This is described by the report’s authors as ‘not viable’ for library budgets to support. These new models of open publishing,


as well as initiatives such as Sustainability Coalition for Open Science Services (SCOSS) and Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB), will allow a broader range of research areas, languages, and formats to be published openly and provide a more equitable research ecosystem.


Evaluating the impact of TAs Jisc, with other consortia and institutions, developed transitional agreements (TAs)


to constrain costs and accelerate open access publishing. Our first TA launched early in 2016. In January this year, cOAlition S, an international consortium of research funding organisations, announced that it will no longer support transformative arrangements after the end of 2024. Jisc is undertaking a review of its


transitional agreements, overseen by its strategic groups. The review will evaluate the performance and effectiveness of TAs against the sector’s requirements and within the global context of open research. It will provide an evidence base to inform sector-led discussions on the future of research distribution.


Supporting trusted and open research We support our members in their journey towards open and trusted research. We can advance open research practices through our negotiations and support efficient research management through our services. Our work will always be led by the priorities of our members and be driven by collective action. To understand more about how Jisc


supports open access with sector-wide negotiations, associated guidance and infrastructure, visit beta.jisc.ac.uk/open- research, and read the research and innovation strategy.


Caren Milloy is director of licensing at Jisc


Spring 2023 Research Information


19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38