News Taking the research journal 'in a new direction'


A new journal concept from Cambridge University Press will bring researchers from different fields together around the fundamental questions that cut across traditional disciplines. The Press says that, by focussing


research on finding answers to such questions, this approach will speed discovery by fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing between subject communities. It is also aimed at providing opportunities to publish research from areas that are not well served by traditional, discipline-specific journals. Informed by feedback from hundreds


of researchers, the first titles under the Research Directions banner will launch in 2022, with an initial set of questions and a publishing model that mirrors the research lifecycle, with results, analysis and impact reviews all published as separate, open access, peer-reviewed and citable outputs on the Press’s Cambridge Core platform. In contrast to the traditional research


paper, researchers will be able to contribute at different stages in the process, sharing and building on each other’s work. They can submit results that address the questions posed, or analysis of others’ results, offering alternative insights and interpretations and using the findings to inform their own work. Review articles will bring together the work done in response to particular questions, describing the context and the impact of what has been published. After the initial launch of each journal,


its future questions will be shaped within the research community, with proposals debated and refined before they are formally posed by editorial boards. Contributors will also be able to link


research published on Cambridge Core to preprints, data, conference presentations and other supporting material that they post on the Press’s early research platform, Cambridge Open Engage, improving transparency and the reproducibility of results. Cambridge Open Engage will further


complement the formal publication of research on Cambridge Core by providing a space for discussion and feedback, helping authors refine their work and allowing wider input from researchers. Research Directions is the brainchild


of Fiona Hutton, executive publisher at the Press and its head of STM open access publishing. A former research scientist, she wants to provide alternatives to traditional journal formats and bring communities together to frame research to problems that no one discipline would


be able to tackle alone. She said: 'There is a revolution under way in scholarly publishing, with major innovation and a disruption of the traditional forms that have become a source of frustration for some researchers. 'Research Directions disrupts traditional journal publication to better reflect the research lifecycle, while attracting researchers and authors to pose and address the big questions in their field. It puts the emphasis firmly back on the research, and provides space for discovery and collaboration in ways limited by traditional research papers. Where before you would have had a series of very static, traditional journals, you will now have living communities of researchers, working together, sharing and learning from each other’s findings to answer questions that they themselves have helped to shape.' She added: 'We retain the benefits of


rigorous and open peer review alongside the quality assurance and support that comes from publishing with Cambridge. We see open research as fundamental to our mission to advance learning, research and knowledge worldwide. We have embraced the drive for open research, combined with freedom from the constraints of print, as an opportunity to experiment and innovate; to offer different solutions, to further the transition to a diverse, open future, and to work with our academic communities to facilitate outstanding research.'


G20 nations' research performance revealed


Clarivate has launched a report that examines the research performance of each of the member countries of the G20. It also includes a special analysis of the G20 members’ Covid-19 research as indexed in the Web of Science research publication and citation index. The report, The Annual


G20 Scorecard – Research Performance 2021 was created by the Institute for Scientific Information at Clarivate ahead of this year’s G20 Summit, which was hosted virtually by Rome, in October. It includes a written summary and an


array of graphs and exhibits that highlight the research performance of Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mainland China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The report focuses on the


different national responses to Covid-19 and the link to each region’s research investment and subject diversity. It finds that regions with more even research bases, especially the United States, Germany and


28 Research Information December 2021/January 2022


the United Kingdom, tend to support a response across a wider range of Covid-19 topics. Other G20 nations with less even research bases tend toward a more specialised response. However, one notable exception is Brazil, where a less diverse research base has responded strongly to Covid-19, reflecting the relevant strengths in its research portfolio, particularly around biosciences. Jonathan Adams, director at the Institute for Scientific Information at Clarivate and a co-author of the report, said: 'The G20 meeting is a crucial


forum for international co- operation and it’s increasingly important to understand how the world’s leading economies are using their expertise and resources to address the world’s present and future challenges. The overall pattern in Covid-19 research that we see from our analysis is clear: as in economics, diversity in national portfolios enables a rapid and agile response. These scorecards will help policymakers, observers and reporters to understand the strengths and opportunities of G20 member nations during this global crisis and beyond.'


@researchinfo | www.researchinformation.info


lim_pix/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32