Open book: a librarian’s view
Swimming against the tide Oluchi Ojinamma Okere considers Nigerian academic libraries and their struggle for relevance
With a history of more than seven decades starting with the establishment of the University of Ibadan in 1948, Nigerian academic libraries have surely come of age. Nigeria presently has more than 170 public and private universities with affiliated academic libraries. There are also many more libraries owned by colleges, polytechnics and monotechnics across the nation. These libraries strive to support the research, teaching, learning and community engagement needs of millions of users. In spite of this robust network of
academic libraries across the nation, service delivery to the teeming population of users can be described as largely unsatisfactory. Library users are dissatisfied with the quality of the stock and complain about the lack of state- of-the-art technologies in their libraries. Researchers particularly view themselves as shortchanged by the lack of access to critical components, such as scholarly databases and ICT infrastructure. In contrast to two decades ago when libraries were the hub of academic activity in the university, Nigerian academic libraries are now ‘the big lumbering giant with little value to anyone’. This is mainly because the libraries lack the capacity to re-invent themselves and evolve in the face of advancements in technology. Aside from striving unsuccessfully to
satisfy disgruntled researchers, academic librarians are also under enormous pressure to fulfill the requirements of the National Universities Commission (NUC), the regulatory body of universities in Nigeria. The commission is known to wield the big stick by withholding the accreditation of university programmes without fear or favour, if and when institutions fail to meet laid down standards, which include satisfactory library services. Thus, librarians are handicapped and frustrated in their efforts to provide standard services, while library administrators are left in a position where they are expected to build castles with straw! Funding is the major pain point of Nigerian public academic institutions. Budgetary cuts have plagued these
28 Research Information October/November 2020
institutions since 1982 when austerity (fiscal and monetary) measures were introduced to revamp a failing Nigerian economy. In spite of increased enrollments and need to invest in new technologies, academic libraries continue to be starved of funds. To make matters worse, one of the responses of parent institutions to coping with the harsh budget cuts, has been to fall upon library votes for some buffer. Releasing 10 per cent of the statutory recurrent expenditure of the university as library vote, as prescribed by the NUC, has been largely ignored by university administrators. Therefore, libraries have been left to flounder and grope for a semblance of serviceability to their weary patrons. Beyond journal subscriptions, which
“Libraries lack the capacity to re-invent themselves and evolve”
require hard currency, the funding needs of academic libraries extend to procurement of furniture and IT equipment, as well as costs of installing and managing automation, enhanced bandwidth, personnel development, collection development – among other requirements for basic library services. The inability of the academic libraries
to provide both traditional and innovative services have left academics, students and researchers questioning the real value of their libraries. The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has also consistently demanded among other interventions, improved library funding. The constant agitation by ASUU has given libraries some succour, as they have benefitted, even if marginally, from the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund), one of the outcomes of the struggles of the union. The implications of a poor research
environment go beyond the perceptions of users about the value of their institutional libraries. There is also the nagging problem of the quality of research that emanates
from the Global South. The glaring gap between the quality and quantity of research output from developing countries and Europe or America, is a clear reflection of the link between government investment in knowledge institutions, such as libraries and development indices. Without doubt, research capacity has a trickle-down effect on the state of national development. Thus, the continuous neglect of academic libraries will only worsen the development issues the nation is battling. How have Nigerian libraries worked
to support the university system under such difficult conditions? Many libraries have reduced the size of their journal subscriptions drastically, and encouraged their research community to make optimal use of open access resources. While accessing free resources online is a god-send to the research community, there is always the fear that uninformed researchers may not be able to differentiate between predatory journals and the ‘unreliable’ science they peddle, and other freely available but more reputable resources. Libraries have also embraced consortium arrangements, which has given them some negotiating edge with the big vendors, publishers and aggregators who market subscription journals. However, these arrangements, if poorly managed, come with their own share of problems. To redress the years of neglect,
academic libraries require a massive infusion of capital. Knowledge is a global good, and knowledge products, as concerns our institutions, may not be locally sourced and might require hard currency. The implication of this is that the Nigerian Government should strategically intervene to support academic libraries by reviewing the existing funding model. To ensure intellectual vibrancy in Nigerian universities, a robust and supportive library system is non-negotiable.
Oluchi Ojinamma Okere is an academic librarian at the Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria
@researchinfo |
www.researchinformation.info
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54
