Industry report
‘We have to work smarter together’ Stephanie Dawson, CEO at Science Open
What do you see as the biggest challenge in scholarly publishing today? The internet and digitalisation has fundamentally changed the equation in ways that we really are just now understanding, and that are going to be affecting us in decades to come. All the pressures on the system go straight back to the internet: open access as a business model, rethinking the role of the library, the move towards greater consolidation. We’re having to come up with a new model in the digital space, and that’s the biggest challenge. Machine learning and artificial intelligence will be driving these changes to the next level. Whatever models we come up
with, we have to take the shift to an article economy, instead of a journal economy seriously, and that really has consequences. Open access has come to be seen as the predominant business model at the article level, capturing the imagination of a lot of parties, but there’s still a lot of questions about whether the APC model is the best model for that. One solution is interoperability, and people are beginning to see this as one of the ways forward: we have to work better together, to work smarter together, to work more interoperably together, because it’s what customers demand. People are used to going online and getting a unified interface. As a discovery platform, ScienceOpen is working at this junction, so we are exploring new information architectures for our digital present and future.
What can the library sector do to help? Libraries are naturally thinking very much in terms of access, and they have been one of the biggest forces behind the shift towards open access – in many places starting or supporting open access journals and managing APCs. But there’s this strange schism of the library, both promoting open access but often not actively curating open access. Libraries are often struggling to say how much open access is even produced in their institutions, and to ensure that open access content is included in catalogues. Institutions and libraries can be really
20 Research Information February/March 2019
“Articles show up outside of top journals... it’s
get an awareness of the major frameworks of scholarly communication, so that they don’t miss out on opportunities, as increasingly the most important readers of their work are computers. In some ways researchers feel like this is all lots of extra work, and they are being asked to open up in ways that can feel a little bit threatening. But it all serves the idea of interoperability, that is essential for a rapid flow of information on the internet. Researchers should see open and interoperable less as helping out their competition, and more about discoverability and having more people find, access, and build upon their research.
increasingly difficult to vet quality”
important in the role of guaranteeing quality. More and more we see highly cited articles showing up outside of top journals, and it becomes increasingly difficult to vet quality. For the last 200 years this has essentially been a publisher’s role, organised via peer review, but as we move into a more diffused situation, libraries can be instrumental in pulling together articles by their researchers, or within a certain topic, so that things don’t get missed and that poor or predatory research is not included. I’d love to see libraries work closely with publishers and research communities to explore new modes of curation.
What can researchers do to help with the challenges of scholarly publishing? Researchers can be more savvy about things like interoperability. They can get an ORCID ID; they can use Think Check Submit (
https://thinkchecksubmit.org) to be smart about finding publishing outlets; they can be smart about the kind of metadata their potential publisher is depositing with CrossRef. They need to
What can publishers do to help overcome challenges in scholarly publishing? Publishers have been really working hard, and have done the most to address some of these things, creating CrossRef, ORCID, and thinking about sharing and interoperable standards, even when they sometimes stand in the way with restrictive access policies. Access management will also be one of the next really big ways in which publishers can work together. Researchers want a seamless way to get content, and funding bodies want to make sure that tax payer-funded research can actually get into the hands of tax payers. At the moment there’s been a relatively small amount of experimentation in making a more seamless access experience for researchers, but that will change. All the pieces that we’ve been working with up until now are going to be taken up a notch in the coming years with AI, with computers doing a lot of these things like curation, and quality control. But the basis for that is still the same: metadata is still extremely important. The Metadata2020 project is hugely important in this respect, in terms of helping publishers, researchers and institutes understand the importance of rich metadata and persistent identifiers for interoperability. Publishers will really need to start thinking about computers as one of the important consumers of their content and what the implications of that is for their business.
@researchinfo |
www.researchinformation.info
Sfio Cracho/
Shutterstock.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
