search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
89 f Carthy’s Commitment


From the archives, the first of this issue’s two major conversations with Martin Carthy came nearly two decades after his debut album was released. Ian Anderson talked with the Big C. for Southern Rag 24, Spring 1985.


songs, the ‘Crown Prince of the Revival’ as he was dubbed by a certain scribe back in the mists of the ’70s. Pretty much coin- ciding on its original release with other debuts by contemporaries like Bert Jan- sch, John Renbourn, The Watersons and Jackson C. Frank, it received favourable reviews in the specialist press of the day and soon formed a cornerstone of any British folk revival collection.


T


In the intervening years, not only had he already left an indelible mark upon the styles adopted by British folk-based singer/guitarists all over the world, he’d also been found in trail-blazing outfits like Steeleye Span, the Albion Country Band and Brass Monkey, not to mention becom- ing a member of Yorkshire’s mighty singing family, the Watersons.


Martin Carthy’s musical biography had already been extensively documented in other interviews over the years so this 1985 conversation turned towards the dif- ferences between the mid-1960s and the ’80s, and what the folk scene had lost and gained in the intervening years.


What was it like working your way around the folk scene twenty years ago, compared with now?


Golly! What a question! I can’t


remember. There weren’t so many clubs, obviously, in ’65, though there were quite a lot. Who was around then? The Camp- bells [Ian Campbell Folk Group] were in full flow. The people who wanted to make it and the people who wanted to just do it, which is the same as now. The big fights used to go on between the Spinners and the Campbells for who wanted to go on last, and stuff like that – absurd situations where the group that had won the argu- ment would finish, go off the stage, and the other group would sprint on from the other side of the stage and do the encore that had been demanded! And on the other hand you had people like the Water- sons, who just wanted to do it. Shirley Collins was performing a lot, and Nigel


he next year was to mark the twentieth anniversary of the first solo record by a man who was to become England’s most influential singer of traditional


Denver was around – that was at a time he was singing very well. Who else was on the road at that time? My mind has been wiped totally clean. People like Owen Hand, Anne Briggs, Bert & John. Davey Graham was in full flow too.


Of course, in those days having an album out was a fairly rare thing for a British folk singer, compared with nowadays when everybody doing the circuit has probably made several. Was there a real thrill in being asked to do one?


I think I probably thought I deserved it at the time. I was a very elitist being in those days. I definitely thought that this was Art and had to be treated with a bit of respect. I did my interview, having done my test – I went and talked to Jack Baver- stock at Fontana and he just took the piss out of me for about an hour. He presented me with these songs and said, “Go on, why don’t you sing that one, that’s a folk song.” I’d say, “No it’s not,” and he’d say, “Course it is. If I said ‘That’s a folk song. If you don’t do it, you don’t get the record- ing contract’, what would you do?” And I sat very regally up in my chair and said, “I’d turn down the contract.” And I could see him sinking into his chair, thinking “Who is this prick?” But it was very neces- sary to be terribly pure at that time, and I’m glad I was.


Any idea how many that first album sold? It was one of those records that was in everybody’s collection in the ‘60s.


Not in the slightest. I’ve no idea how many any of my records have sold, except once Max Hole told me that Crown Of Horn had gone over 10,000. I can remem- ber getting a statement from Fontana say- ing that I’d sold 500 copies, and that was when I’d seen more than 500! After that I decided not to bother to look at state- ments any more. As far as I was concerned, the folk side of Fontana was a tax write- off, to help Dusty Springfield make her records, or Kiki Dee.


At your gig last night, it was noticeable that quite a lot of the floor singers were doing songs which meant something…


That’s something that was there in ’65 and is beginning to creep back now – com- mitment. It’s been missing for an awful


long time. There’s still an awful lot of flab and wind about, but I think the miners’ strike has had a lot to do with it. It has focussed a few people’s minds wonderful- ly, as it should.


There certainly was that commitment 20 years ago, even though we didn’t have that general malaise, the unemployment and so on.


A lot of the clubs in those days were started by CND people. A lot of it was youthful commitment, but there were plenty of older people there too, who were as committed.


That’s certainly reflected in your Three City Four album for Decca.


Well that was the nature of the group. A group that Leon (Rosselson) is in doesn’t sing traditional songs, or only one or two. Basically, it’ll want to sing committed stuff. If you join a group with Leon, you’re giv- ing yourself to what he does.


What became of the other two in that group?


Ralph Trainer was a headmaster – I


don’t know much about what’s happened to him. Marian MacKenzie married Pete Shutler of the Yetties and doesn’t sing any more – yet another case of a woman folk singer getting married and never stepping onto a stage again, or only occa- sionally. That’s a thing that has been wrong with the folk scene over twenty years. When we were all young and we were all together, there were a lot of women singers. Then the committed women singers got married to the com- mitted men singers, and the men were the only ones who stepped outside of the house to do any singing. I don’t think it was a question of deliberate chauvinist piggery, it was just the way it had always been done – it didn’t occur to them. There’s a lot of consciousness-raising could have been done, still has to be done. A lot of it seems to have passed us by, I’m afraid. I heard a good woman singer the other night in Brighton and it reminded me – you just don’t hear good women singers. It ain’t that they’re not around. And that old thing of the girl just standing up singing and the bloke play- ing the instruments – it’s absurd.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148