search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Screening


References 1 Sandercock, AM et al. Identification of anti-tumour biologics using primary tumour models, 3-D phenotypic screening and image-based multi-parametric profiling. Molecular Cancer 2015; 14:147 2 Williams, G et al. Phenotypic screening reveals TNFR2 as a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Oncotarget 2016; 7(42): 68278-91. 3 Salanti, A et al. Targeting human cancer by a glycosaminoglycan binding malaria protein. Cancer Cell 2015; 28(4):500-14. 4Turner, L et al. Severe malaria is associated with parasite binding to endothelial protein C receptor. Nature 2013; 498:502.


of label-free detection strategies for small molecules is currently under way.


In fewer than 10% of cases, high background binding of the phenotypic molecule to the host HEK293 cells will be observed. In all probability this is caused by high endogenous expression of the target which renders the molecule unsuitable for screening. This issue could potentially be addressed by optimising the technology for alter- native cell types.


Impact


cDNA expression cell microarrays now provide a very powerful approach for rapidly identifying the membrane targets of phenotypic molecules which has removed the traditional deconvolution bottle- neck from phenotypic drug discovery. Due to suc- cess rates which far surpass other methodologies, the approach has been widely adopted across the industry and has garnered considerable interest among academic groups.The power of the technol- ogy to facilitate phenotypic drug discovery will only increase as libraries continue to expand and provide further coverage of the membrane pro- teome, incorporating both new membrane proteins as well as additional isoforms of proteins that are already represented.


As phenotypic drug discovery continues to advance, the accompanying target deconvolution efforts will undoubtedly expand our collective understanding of the critical receptors that are implicated in disease processes and that mediate the therapeutic response.


DDW


Dr Jim Freeth co-founded Retrogenix in 2008, developing a world-leading technology for identi- fying both the receptor targets and off-targets of antibodies, proteins, small molecules and viruses. Retrogenix now works with 14-15 top pharmaceu- tical companies, numerous drug discovery compa- nies and leading academics. Prior to Retrogenix, Jim spent more than 10 years in management with- in the biotech and pharmaceutical industry. A biol- ogist by training, Jim obtained his PhD at Manchester University, UK in 1997.


Dr Elizabeth Kingsley provides scientific support to the business development activities at Retrogenix, working closely with research groups at global pharmaceutical companies to plan pro- jects aiming to identify the specific cell surface tar- gets of biologics and small molecules. She also works more widely with biotechnology companies on PR communications and marketing strategies.


50 Drug Discovery World Fall 2017


Elizabeth has a PhD in molecular biology from the University of Manchester, UK.


Jo Soden co-founded Retrogenix and was instru- mental in developing and commercialising the cell microarray technology. Jo leads a talented team of scientists, overseeing all internal technology R&D activities and managing Retrogenix’s portfolio of commercial projects. She has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed scientific publications and her background includes 17 years of research experience at the University of Manchester, UK, where she also obtained her MPhil.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72