search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
T


he stakes are high. The so-called Great Resignation or Great Re-evaluation spurred by the Covid-19 pandemic is prompting high attrition, record pay awards and deepening


skills shortages. Employees want meaningful work with employers whose purpose makes sense to them. They also want to feel valued, cared for and like they can progress. It’s in this context that Peter Cheese, Chief Executive


of the CIPD, called for HR to “rewrite the rulebook” at the professional body for HR and people development’s annual conference at the end of last year. Could the five-day working week be the first to have a line crossed through it?


TAKE FIVE – OR FOUR? Critics of the five-day week say this cornerstone of working life is no longer fit for purpose in post-industrial economies of the twenty-first century, linking it to poor wellbeing and productivity. Instead, hybrid working patterns that combine


flexibility of working hours with where we work are shaking up the working week as we emerge from Covid-19 restrictions in many parts of the world and return to “business as normal”. So much so that last year, data from HR software


provider CharlieHR suggested fewer than 5% of SMEs would return to the nine-five/five-day week post- lockdown. A significant amount of research also shows that a majority of employees would consider leaving their employer if their option to work from home was removed. In the workplace, organisations of all sizes and


representing diverse sectors are arguing the case – and indeed piloting – a four-day working week: Microsoft, Unilever, Morrisons and Durham-based online challenger bank Atom among them. Commenting on its six-month trial, which sees office-based staff work four nine-hour days and one six-hour Saturday every four weeks, supermarket chain Morrisons said: “The idea is that this innovative new way of working will mean we are much more flexible and responsive, and we think it will make Morrisons a place where more people will want to join – and stay. “The company noticed that working from home


during the pandemic had made employees more productive, quicker and more flexible. It can help us as a company to be more productive. It can have all sorts of health benefits. And it puts everybody’s wellbeing first.” Morrisons joins at least 30 more companies in the


UK and proponents like the Icelandic government, which ran a successful trial with Reykjavik City between 2015-19. Employees worked 35-36 hours across four days for the same pay as five days across a wide range of workplace and shift patterns. Iceland’s Association for Sustainable Democracy


(Alda) and UK think-tank Autonomy’s study tracked the scheme. Their concluding study, Going Public: Iceland’s journey to a shorter working week, reported unchanged or higher productivity alongside unchanged service levels. Their research also found that “worker wellbeing dramatically increased across a range of indicators,


25


THINK GLOBAL PEOPLE HR


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56