This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CCR2 Affordability Assessments & Vulnerability


The missing piece for training enforcement agents


Should vulnerability training be made compulsory for all enforcement agents?


Alan Smith Director – corporate governance, High Court Enforcement Group alan.smith@hcegroup.co.uk


As you might expect, the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Money Advice Liaison Group, CAB and other organisations have made representations to the Ministry of Justice to have mandatory vulnerability training for enforcement agents.


But you might be a little more surprised to learn that this view is fully shared by High Court Enforcement Group, who have championed mental health and vulnerability awareness and quality marked vulnerability training within the enforcement industry for many years.


Policies and practice


It is one thing to have vulnerability policies in place, but quite another to ensure that your employees and agents really understand, and can identify, those who are vulnerable, and know how to handle those situations. For us, policies alone were never sufficient: we have recently developed a regulated Level 3 Award in ‘Vulnerability and Mental Health Awareness in Relation to Enforcement Practices’.


The qualification forms part of a larger Level 3 course in ‘Taking Control of Goods and Civil Enforcement’, that we have also developed. These bespoke Level 3 courses are the first in the country to be validated by a regulated qualification, sitting on the Regulated Qualifications Framework (RQF). The training in the awareness of vulnerability and mental health was evaluated


28


across 23 indicators for the Quality Mark, including learner engagement, equality and diversity, delivery planning and preparation, quality assurance, and delivery expertise, by the Ofqual accredited national awarding body, Agored Cymru.


Quality Mark


The Quality Mark is an endorsement and celebration of outstanding practice in delivering learning and, in January 2017, Agored Cymru awarded us the Quality Mark in vulnerability training.


In notification of the award, Agored Cymru’s director of Quality, Standards & Regulations said: “We would like to take the opportunity to commend you for the high


www.CCRMagazine.co.uk


Awareness of vulnerability and mental health should be a fundamental component in the enforcement agent’s toolbox, not only


enforcement agents, but also administration staff involved in civil enforcement


level of quality and effort that has clearly been put in to designing, implementing, and quality marking this course that so importantly raises awareness of vulnerability and mental health.”


Amongst other aspects, the award covers gaining explicit consent to comply with the Data Protection Act 1998, using the five components of the TEXAS acronym, and the compass technique for structuring an interview when dealing with people with mental ill-health.


People suffering in this regard are, unfortunately, often more susceptible to falling into a cycle of illness and debt.


Significant requirements


There are significant legal requirements on enforcement agents, including compliance with the Mental Health Capacity Act 2005, Equality Act 2010, Data Protection Act 1998, Tribunals Courts & Enforcement Act 2007, European Convention on Human Rights (Article 14), and the Taking Control of Goods: National Standards 2014. It is important to note that the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 do not prohibit the taking control of goods where a person is 'vulnerable' and the law does allow enforcement against vulnerable people, but this must be done in a fair and appropriate manner.


Protection for vulnerable debtors is provided by Regulations 10 and 23 of the


March 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56