search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
News Around the World


Thomas Ruyant’s Guillaume Verdier designed Linkedout is one of the dark horses of this Vendée Globe. Ruyant and Antoine Koche had a forced pitstop soon after the start of the last TJV with pilot failure but once going again passed almost the entire fleet to finish 5th. The Verdier design sits between Charal and L’Occitane in terms of form stability, but with a flat run aft comparable to the Juan K designs contrasting with the V-ed aft hull of Charal. Same objective of a clean take-off and landing – two different ways to approach it


JB:We need power in the sails to take off but then we must quickly flatten and adjust them because of the increase of the apparent wind and the wind heading as soon as the boat gets higher. It is also necessary to adapt the cant angle of the keel to adjust the rake by giving the fin more angle to take off and then reduce it in flight mode. But this is easy because it is simple to press a button! Also, as I said before, we play with the weight distribution inside


the boat starting with the water ballasts. While flying the lack of elevators on the rudders is disappointing because it would help a lot to keep the right attitude… Instead the game today is to stay in the air as long as possible because the speed gain is considerable. It is necessary to find both a constant trim and a foil that stalls


as little as possible. That’s not easy because you can fly from 12kt to 30kt of wind. The limit is the sea state. It’s hard to say how long we’re going to be in flight mode during the VG as I lack experience in a short sea and strong wind. In the TJV we had these kinds of conditions before the Canary Islands. We were going fast but the attitude of the boat was irregular (go and stop) and was not sat- isfactory. It confirmed that the new foils (which were then already designed) had to deliver a better attitude. We should fly longer with the V2s when the wind gets stronger. SH: Comparing your foils to Hugo Boss’s? JB:Hugo Boss’s V1 foils are optimised for running (remember how fast the ‘black beast’ was sailing out of the Channel on the first night of the TJV). Our foils are more versatile. With the V2 we try to go faster running with a better attitude of the boat. We also want to maintain versatility because a long race like the VG is dogged by transition zones. It is not sufficient to be the fastest running. SH: What are the other parameters beside the flying mode? JB: It depends on the weight of the boat and her static RM… You can decide to make a very extreme boat at 20 tonne-metres of RM, or less, where all the power comes from the foil – but then you have to quickly get to take-off speed. Or you take a 25 tonne-metre design with quite a lot of ballast, a big bulb, a powerful hull to have stability until the boat flies. Not all the foilers are the same at this level. Bulb weight and


22 SEAHORSE


ballast capacity are important figures for the CoG and remain confidential. And then it’s not just about foils. There are the 110° AVS rule and the 127.5° limit that decide a lot of things. Roughly speaking, if you reduce your ballast volume you can reduce your bulb weight. The ideal would be to have big ballasts and a small bulb… But that’s not possible. Also, the keel cant affects the 110° just like the weight of the bulb… It’s complicated! You have to do a lot of calculations but also add in some gut


feeling. We also saw things that were winning on paper that turned out to be ‘losers’ in real terms while navigating… Plus the range of our studies is still growing. SH: What about the modifications made to the bow of Charal? JB: Originally we had thin bow shapes to pierce the waves but now the Imocas and especially Charal are frequently above the water. When we were flying we felt that the forefoot of the boat was quite often hitting the water – when the boat overtakes the waves the bow bites into the water and upsets the speed and tracking of the boat. This of course then compromises the sail trim. How can this impact be reduced? The lowest and most advanced


portion of the bow has been refined to facilitate passage through the waves sailing at high speed. Our goal is to get the bow out of the water as quickly as possible. We went from the wave-piercing bow to a fuller, more rounded and banana-shaped bow to help the boat take off as quickly as possible. Nicolas Andrieu from our team put it quite simply when he said, ‘Our objective now is to climb over the water rather than cut through it.’ SH: Your thoughts six months out from the VG start? JB: We already have good experience of the boat and a lot of reference data. So we’ll be able to progress quickly operating the new configuration during the coming months. But we will still need more navigation to compare theory and practice. Looking at the VG, I hope my experience of three previous races will allow me to make the right choices. Last time we put all our resources into foil changes (the boat was named Maïtre Coq and is now Initiatives-Coeur). This time we have more resources to be at the top in all areas. The VG is not controllable, the preparation is and we do our best.





PIERRE BOURAS/DPPI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115