search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems



Two of the best… racing at the 2000 Kenwood Cup in Hawaii (left) and the French team (above) celebrate their first and only Admiral’s Cup victory in Plymouth after the 1991 Fastnet Race. The Kenwood Cup – and the Clipper Cup before it – was always under pressure because of the investment of time and money needed to compete at a venue that hosted no other big event; however, the sailing conditions kept the negatives in check until the rating rule hiatus at the end of the 1990s made the racing less competitive and the prize less prestigious. Similarly the Admiral’s Cup, less shorts and T-shirts but more prestigious to win for your country. Contrary to wider perceptions, the Cowes event was not nailed through cost but primarily by the focus on offshore racing on handicap shifting in favour of a more inshore oriented regatta in level-rating classes. No longer could ‘run what you brung’ handicap entries be attracted to the event by the glimmer of an occasional left field success, now it was bring a full pro crew and even more importantly an absolute top of the game level-rating boat or just stay at home. There were no ‘dogs having their day’ any more and international interest crashed spectacularly. A perfect example of forgetting who pays for it all


quickly. They know it can be lonely at the top. As a theory it is a bit chicken and egg – the events I refer to did cease to exist for a reason, although that reason was not just lack of interest. However, a sailing world solely relying on niche classes like the Maxi72 and TP52, or possibly further into the future the Fast40, to provide second-hand racers and equipment for handicap racing cannot be seen as healthy. So what type of event could bring back a good balance between cost and pleasure, triggering the wish to plan for and build new… and enjoy?


For sure it has to be an international event, possibly with a component of representing one’s country. Straightaway you then add the costs of travelling and lodging but I feel it will continue to be hard to create enough motivation and quality within any existing local fleets.


Such an event will have a better chance if it travels itself too, like our other sailing world championship events generally do. In the 1970s and ’80s we had both travelling events (the Ton Cups) as well as a number of stationary events, where the ‘locals’ committed to visiting each other; for example, an Australian team would travel to the Solent for the Admiral’s Cup and a British team to Australia for the Southern Cross.


To recreate this you would need at least three international high- level stationary events, probably in Australia, the Med and the USA, which right now seems as if we are aiming too high. The alternative, an event travelling between three or why not four or five continents, I feel has a better chance. Then of course there is a lot more to discuss and decide – but where there is a will there’s a way. The idea should be to up the fun, up the prestige if you wish, as in the end building and racing new boats is not about saving money. At least if I look at the luxury market it is not… Rob Weiland, TP52 and Maxi72 class manager


 SEAHORSE 29


NDE2 -


MOTORIZED FURLER :


Comfort & Reliability


Electric & hydraulic models 9 models available for boats from 9 to 22 m


marine@wichard.com www.profurl.com


AJAX/ALAMY


credit photo: JS Evrard


JS Evrard


Go Electric!


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100